Hi everyone

[Luna]

My name is Luna and i come from a different server. I'm trying to ban a prevously banned player named Chuck-D Northside on another server. I would love proof of his ban aka DEMOS so I can have actual proof Thank you. Please help

[What]

http://www.ibisgaming.com/forums/showthread.php/10750-CHUCK-D-%E1%B4%BA%E1%B4%BC%E1%B4%BF%E1%B5%80%E1%B4%B4%D2%8 9side-%D2%89-03-22-2013-5-49PM?highlight=chuck-d

literally took 2 seconds to do a search for chuck-d.

[jwtemp]

My name is Luna and i come from a different server. I'm trying to ban a prevously banned player named Chuck-D Northside on another server. I would love proof of his ban aka DEMOS so I can have actual proof Thank you. Please help

Hi Luna. I actually discovered Chuck-D's hackery and enacted the ban on him. It was clear to me he was walling and the demo that What has linked to above will prove it. The demo was recorded prior to the latest patch, however, and may not actually play in an updated version of CS:S. :( I hope it does though. If not, I can tell you that his hacking was subtle, so finding solid evidence on him might be tricky. I can assure you he's a cheat though and watching him long enough should result in the proof you need.

[CYBER]

Demo was recorded prior to the fucking valve update so unfortunately you cannot see it.

But here in IBIS, imho, we have the best streak in the world when it comes to appropriate bans and accuracy.

We have a process that involves an admin to post a demo of a suspected hacker. That demo is then reviewed by 3 elite admins with the best hacker-catching skills around (Upper level admins -or ULAs- that include Brett and Scribble from that link, and myself)

As you can see, brett was about to vote on a NO on the first demo provided because it was inconclusive, only when a 100% conclusive demo showed up, he then voted a yes. We actually CARE that innocents don't get wrongfully banned because some of us have been accused wrongfully before on other servers...and it stings, and we don't want that in ibis.

And you can take our word for it when 2/3 of ULA agree on hacks.

Our protocol and work is also overseen by Clan Members who are the highest ranked veterans of this community (most of whom held the ULA spots in their days too).

And the final decision can even be overruled by the Server Owner himself. So again... we get shit done. and we get shit done right.
So although you cannot view a demo and you cannot see the proof for yourself, you can by all means consider ibis perma bans as conclusive and not questionable or else we unban them (even shitty players... if there's ANY doubt the person isnt hacking, they are not banned. it's our rule).

There is almost no chance for our bans to be inaccurate due to the amount of people involved. Not to mention that if a player posts an unban thread, every single admin and ULA who voted on him beforehand cannot vote anymore, and basically requires a new set of votes to reban him again, which thereby DOUBLE confirms that he is or isnt a hacker. :)

Feel free to go through the last n-demos of hackers we have, you'll see that our permas are very accurate, and I've actually had a run with a few server owners who simply import our exported sourcebans list due to the reliability of our bans:D


That's all we can offer, blame it on valve :(


have a good day!

[brett friggin favre]

Yeah we're good. Short of having an old css install to watch the demos on, you'll just have to take our word for it.

[CYBER]

Yeah we're good. Short of having an old css install to watch the demos on, you'll just have to take our word for it.

i tried that bud. it doesnt work.

I tried loading the old shark2c demos , remember that fucker?
i tried running them on my brother's steam who was on the old version AND OFFLINE for the last 3 months, and it wouldnt run. somehow they actually managed to inheritely screw up the demo pipeline...

fucking valve.

[What]

There is also a vac ban on that account so there is some more evidence of his haxing douchebaggery.