PDA

View Full Version : SweatingBullets_MN



Pink
07-06-2009, 09:07 PM
SweatingBullets_MN was banned for killing the zombie by blowing up the bridge for 1 week.

I find this personally as an admin not right, I understand why lukey banned him since past few rounds people killed the whole CT team but he didnt he won the game for us that how you suppose to blow the bridge I dont blame lukey but I think SweatingBullets_MN should be unbanned

So other admins please get his steam ID and unban him cause I am not sure if I am aloud to or not.

walterbrunswick
07-06-2009, 09:08 PM
I've banned people for 2 days for doing that.

ER, blowing it on humans*

Pink
07-06-2009, 09:10 PM
I've banned people for 2 days for doing that.

He killed the zombie tho. No one Should be banned for doing there JOB

lukeydukey
07-06-2009, 09:13 PM
i don't mind reducing the ban but i don't agree on a full unban based of the fact that cts were warned multiple times not to blow the bridge with that many humans on it

tking 1/2 the team can't be weighed as a win because the zombie died with them imho.

Pink
07-06-2009, 09:16 PM
I am glad you rpely, but i really dont find it right for some one trying to same human kind to get banned at all. I mean if the person was just a TK lamer then yes ban them. But he killed the zombie and saved the humans

walterbrunswick
07-06-2009, 09:18 PM
This is a tough call.

I would have to side with Pink. I would rather my brother-in-arms kill me than let the enemy get to me.

Lukeydukey's ban was unjustified if this is the case.

mastercheff
07-06-2009, 09:24 PM
i think if he took a mother fucking zombie down he deserves to be unbanned even though it was just half

&&toasties
07-06-2009, 09:35 PM
i don't mind reducing the ban but i don't agree on a full unban based of the fact that cts were warned multiple times not to blow the bridge with that many humans on it

tking 1/2 the team can't be weighed as a win because the zombie died with them imho.

I'm kind of half and half here.

If there was half of the team on the bridge, Luke was right in banning.

Win or not, killing half of the team, screwing with THEIR scores, to save your own ass, is not right at all.

Now...

If there was only the zombie there, he had no right.

...

Luke is a hardass, and for good reasons too.

When he got admin back, the server started cleaning up, because he doesn't put up with ANY bullshit...

Pink
07-06-2009, 09:39 PM
I think luke is a good admin, I think I would agree with luke most of the time but I think a badcall happen every makes badcalls now and then. I want that person to be unbanned thats why I am here I am here for the people.

Christmas
07-06-2009, 10:08 PM
Sometimes humans have to die so the rest can live.

Wasn't there, so it is hard to judge. Ban seems too long considering there was a zombie on it, and it is perfectly reasonable for him to make a rash decision based on the fact a zombie was coming. The ban is in place to prevent malpractice, and I don't think that is the case here.

XxMastagunzxX
07-06-2009, 10:35 PM
We all have our opinions, but let me say this. I would not have banned him. If I had it especially would have not been a week but for maybe 10 minutes. It is up to lukey or somebody of higher authority to unban him so do not take it into your own hands.

Shinkiro
07-06-2009, 10:55 PM
Well if i was killed on that bridge zombie or fucking not i would have been pissed.........mostly because i didnt do it, or at least next time before u push the plunger say "JUMP OFF THE GODDAMN BRIDGE U FUCKING IDIOTS... NOW!!"

:lmao:

Jeimuzu
07-07-2009, 11:22 AM
Whenever someone prenuked or destroyed a bridge after I warned everyone at the beginning of the round via mic and chat, I would ban them for 1-2 days depending on my mood. However, I would often tell people not to stand next to the button until they need to, otherwise I would move them to spec. That way they don't get accused.

But if someone was doing this over and over again, despite several warning, I would ban them for a good 7 days.

Pink
07-07-2009, 03:24 PM
Whenever someone prenuked or destroyed a bridge after I warned everyone at the beginning of the round via mic and chat, I would ban them for 1-2 days depending on my mood. However, I would often tell people not to stand next to the button until they need to, otherwise I would move them to spec. That way they don't get accused.

But if someone was doing this over and over again, despite several warning, I would ban them for a good 7 days.

Yes but thats not the case here, the case is that we only know this person did it once and killed a zombie while doing it. So theres no reason i see personally that this person should be banned

ZERO
07-07-2009, 07:24 PM
If there is a zombie on the bridge it should be blown right away! In fact I think that if he did not blow the bridge he should get into trouble for making the humans lose.

If the humans are too nub to get off before the zombie gets on then though shit.