Sqwertle May 19th, 11:45 (Central)

[sudo]

IGN: Sqwertle
SteamID: STEAM_0:0:5884415
Who Banned You?: NYS I think.
When: May 19th, 11:45 (central)
Where: the pub
Why Banned?: No idea, no ban message no warning. I was just playing, hadn't said a word in 30 minutes or so, not that I wasn't supposed to; just hadn't.

Why should you be unbanned?: I couldn't have done anything wrong as far as I know.

[sudo]

Can I at least find out why I'm banned?

Edit: Apparently I wall, anyways if there isn't a demo or some undeniable proof can I get unbanned?

Edit2: NYS is the guy who banned me (at least that's what I was told). Since there isn't any proof how does this work?

[ZERO]

If an admin does not post as to why you are banned you will be unbanned in a few days.

[sudo]

Edit: That rule should really be rethought. Without proof an admin can ban someone for a few days for "hacking" and it's okay, no one thinks anything of it.

[acolyte_to_jippity]

well, he doesn't have to post a topic for less than a perma, but he will probably reply to this thread sooner or later

[sudo]

"post a topic for less than a perma"? "he" being myself or NYS?

[maynard]

seeing how you're not an admin he means NYS... obviously.

it's simple, admins only have to let the public know baout perma bans. temp bans, we don't report cause there's no reason 2.

if NYS bannd you, then you did something wrong, regardless of you knowing it or not. just wait the ban out.

[sudo]

As far as I know it's not a temp ban. I was given no indication other than I was told I was hacking. Seeing as how I wasn't, and he has yet to post proof the conclusion is that I did nothing wrong. And of course he OBVIOUSLY meant NYC, you'll have to forgive me for not knowing that admins aren't required to post in a non-perma thread. Or maybe like you said, "whether I know it or not", I must have been accidentally hacking and not realized it... Yes, that must be it.

Back to the permaban part, afaik he hasn't said that this isn't a perma ban, I'd assume that if I were banned for hacking it would be permanent. If he temporarily banned me for hacking, well... that's just bad adminship as hackers should be banned permanently. Anyways, I'd sure like to see some proof, and get a little less sarcasm.

[Nemesis]

if NYS bannd you, then you did something wrong, regardless of you knowing it or not. just wait the ban out.

yes, because it's not like he's had dozens of abuse threads on him or anything...

[Perry]

Well i dont like NYS, but he has a good eye for hackers. I will not be bias until we see a demo.

Everyone should be un bias until proof has been given

[acolyte_to_jippity]

Well i dont like NYS, but he has a good eye for hackers. I will not be bias until we see a demo.

Everyone should be un bias until proof has been given

agree.

also, dude, i'd reccomend you fix your attitude up a bit. you're sounding a bit hostile there.

[Nemesis]

Well i dont like NYS, but he has a good eye for hackers. I will not be bias until we see a demo.

Everyone should be un bias until proof has been given

thanks judge judy.

[Perry]

agree.

also, dude, i'd reccomend you fix your attitude up a bit. you're sounding a bit hostile there.

how is this hostile? i am giving an opinion on NYS hacker catching abilities and saying everyone should judge un bias like until proof has been giving.

[acolyte_to_jippity]

how is this hostile? i am giving an opinion on NYS hacker catching abilities and saying everyone should judge un bias like until proof has been giving.

not you.

[-=NYS=- C.O.]

After reviewing my demo, I have found it to be inconclusive at this time. My apologies for any inconvenience.

As for you Nemesis, you'll always be a fat douchebag jerkoff.

Unbanned