B-Man

[Ledgeby]

Name in Game: B-Man
Steam-ID: STEAM_0:0:39725157
Where: Zombie Mod 5952
Link to any previous bans: None
Reason to ban: Rank Manipulation. Staying in spawn to get intentionally tagged, then moving on to kill other players as a zombie. Finished with a score of 38-9 all of which were zombie kills. I don't have ticks as it is done every round.

[Steamer]

Tick 38k, 74k, so on. This is plainly against rules and Bman has played long enough to know better. The rules clearly state no staying in spawn to kill and attack first zombie on escape maps and to complete objective. IMO, rank manipulation. Who was the other vote? This has reached two votes and I must ban. Bman, since I know you, I will advise you to submit an unban thread and see what mercy you can receive. Closed, Permanent Ban due to rank manipulation.

[CYBER]

Tick 38k, 74k, so on. This is plainly against rules and Bman has played long enough to know better. The rules clearly state no staying in spawn to kill and attack first zombie on escape maps and to complete objective. IMO, rank manipulation. Who was the other vote? This has reached two votes and I must ban. Bman, since I know you, I will advise you to submit an unban thread and see what mercy you can receive. Closed, Permanent Ban due to rank manipulation.

maynard, im posting here with no intention of voting at this moment bcos im at work, jsut wanted to provide something very important :

steamr,
the second vote above was "legeby" (click on the votes)
how the fuck is legeby able to post a YES on a fucking ban request??...

ZERO ?...arent ban threads supposed to be ULA + clan only accessible for votes?

also, steamr, i am reopening the thread since u didnt receive another "yes" from another ula which would have given u the OK to ban, it was from legeby, the user that made this thread. 1- he is no ula lol... and 2- not to mention that his vote is biased considering he made the thread... (right or wrong , doesnt matter...)

re-opened until myself (after work) or another ula or clan sees this.

this is under temp ban sure, but it is also about rank manipulation which warrrants a perma, so if any ula who votes on this before me, make it clear whether you are moving for a perma or temp ban.
i will definitely see this at 6:30 pm at most, i will also support your perma ban request if rank manipulation is confirmed.
I'm tired of giving chances to people in zmod.

[acolyte_to_jippity]

maynard, im posting here with no intention of voting at this moment bcos im at work, jsut wanted to provide something very important :

steamr,
the second vote above was "legeby" (click on the votes)
how the fuck is legeby able to post a YES on a fucking ban request??...

ZERO ?...arent ban threads supposed to be ULA + clan only accessible for votes?

also, steamr, i am reopening the thread since u didnt receive another "yes" from another ula which would have given u the OK to ban, it was from legeby, the user that made this thread. 1- he is no ula lol... and 2- not to mention that his vote is biased considering he made the thread... (right or wrong , doesnt matter...)

re-opened until myself (after work) or another ula or clan sees this.

this is under temp ban sure, but it is also about rank manipulation which warrrants a perma, so if any ula who votes on this before me, make it clear whether you are moving for a perma or temp ban.
i will definitely see this at 6:30 pm at most, i will also support your perma ban request if rank manipulation is confirmed.
I'm tired of giving chances to people in zmod.

because this is in temp-ban requests, not user perma-ban requests.

[Steamer]

Fucking wrong place, though a ULA voted, anyway, user is unbanned until the next ULA votes (my apologies B-Man), also Ledgeby, any form of rank manipulation belongs in PERMANENT section, and you DO NOT vote on your own ban threads. Also, if this move's to permanent ban, follow with non-vote thread for record. I misread the section and thought it was already in that section.

You should get on the explanation and ensuing unban thread now B-Man.

[maynard]

maynard, im posting here with no intention of voting at this moment

big surprise!



standard admins can vote on user perma ban requests.... this thread is simply in the wrong section as he's an admin, and cause he's an admin and in the user perma ban request section, he was able 2 vote on it. only a couple standard admins have bothered voting ever on these threads, most just leave it all for the ULA's or clan.

you can't vote on your own thread... so anyway you cut it, his vote is asinine and wrong.

[Steamer]

Can you move this to perm section Maynard? Pwease... If not, I will just remake it later, as the ZM is getting far out of hand with rank manip and the like, even if that means cleaning up others failed work. And this is why we also have the ULA's to overturn said Standard admin perma ban requests, so remember, no matter what, always look into the situation yourself. Don't go off word or opinion just because others you trust voted. We five have made it to this position for a reason, that trust of individual recognition and non-biased opinion being one of them.

1/5 on votes.

[acolyte_to_jippity]

standard admins can vote on user perma ban requests.... this thread is simply in the wrong section as he's an admin, and cause he's an admin and in the user perma ban request section, he was able 2 vote on it. only a couple standard admins have bothered voting ever on these threads, most just leave it all for the ULA's or clan.


point of order, regular admins cannot vote on anything but temp-ban requests. they cannot vote on perma requests coming from users, or admins.

[CYBER]

big surprise!

and cause he's an admin and in the user perma ban request section, he was able 2 vote on it.

you can't vote on your own thread... so anyway you cut it, his vote is asinine and wrong.

Hey ur welcome! i had to post about this shit before shit hit the fan bcos i know steamr JUST voted so he could fix that shit first...I really didnt want to go back into that habit, honest.. lol..

2- this is the thing that confused me, i have no clue who the fuck legeby is, and i assumed he was a user since he posted in user section... didnt even consider the chance that he's admin, no one would fail THIS muuc...chh... ok nevermind.

and yeah, this belongs in perma ban. and just to piss u off maynard, buddy, im gonna vote on it ! humph....

[Steamer]

Hey ur welcome! i had to post about this shit before shit hit the fan bcos i know steamr JUST voted so he could fix that shit first...I really didnt want to go back into that habit, honest.. lol..

2- this is the thing that confused me, i have no clue who the fuck legeby is, and i assumed he was a user since he posted in user section... didnt even consider the chance that he's admin, no one would fail THIS muuc...chh... ok nevermind.

and yeah, this belongs in perma ban. and just to piss u off maynard, buddy, im gonna vote on it ! humph....

You don't have to, I'm sure Maynard would have brought it to my attention in due time. :smirk:

[B-Man]

Name In Game: B-Man
Steam ID: STEAM_0:0:39725157
Who banned me: Ledgeby
When: 14:55
Where: Zombie Mod
Why banned: Rank Manipulation
Link to ban: http://www.ibisgaming.com/sourcebans...725157&Submit=

I apologize for the mistake. Though I play on Ibis often; I've never read the rules in all honesty; and I did not know what I did was considered rank manipulation. I was given no warning either to make me realize what I was doing was wrong. I enjoy ZM very much and have made several Steam friends from the server. I would like to continue playing on Ibis servers. I will read the rules thoroughly and I promise to abide by them at all times.
Thank you for taking the time to consider my Unban request.

Sincerely,

B-Man

[Steamer]

Considering the explanation, I wish to move my vote to a non-ban and a finalized warning. This may be a harsh forcefully ran community (I enjoy this fact) , but there is indeed mercy given at times.

[Spasm]

Considering the explanation, I wish to move my vote to a non-ban and a finalized warning. This may be a harsh forcefully ran community (I enjoy this fact) , but there is indeed mercy given at times.
Agree with this Closed.