[SUGGESTION] Auto Assign

[Obez]

Do you guys think we could try out forced auto-assign? We were talking about it in the server and thought that maybe, if it was given a try, that it would help out from the major team stack (Where the best players don't go against eachother, but with and rape the other team). Also, would stop people from sitting in spec to try and get a team they want. I'm open to feedback so post what you guys think.

[Meltdown]

Reason i dont play wcs, too much trouble then it is really worth, to be gang raped day after day after dat to gain little bit of experience, nahh no thanks. People with lots of power should play against each other why else do u get all this experience?? Everyone wants a changle or do i get the conept of wcs wrong.

[What]

All this would do is have people leave and come back to try and get on the team they want, wouldn't really solve anything just make it more annoying

[ZERO]

The admins have been discussing programing ways to adjust game balance to correct the issue. Last night we arrived at a solution but it will take a few weeks for me to program it in.

Admins like to discuss sensitive matters like this in the private forum so we can openly express a lot of ideas without worry of the regulars flipping out going oh shit they going to break the game ect. What I can say now is that any plans that are implemented will allow for better players to still stand out, will maintain current gameplay structure and will be tested extensivly and observed closly to ensure balance and bug free preformance.

[brett friggin favre]

The admins have been discussing programing ways to adjust game balance to correct the issue. Last night we arrived at a solution but it will take a few weeks for me to program it in.

Admins like to discuss sensitive matters like this in the private forum so we can openly express a lot of ideas without worry of the regulars flipping out going oh shit they going to break the game ect. What I can say now is that any plans that are implemented will allow for better players to still stand out, will maintain current gameplay structure and will be tested extensivly and observed closly to ensure balance and bug free preformance.

this. also forcing auto assign can mess with restricted traces and some people who are nice enough to switch off a stacked team would not be able to. a solution is in the works and it will definitely be better than simply forcing auto assign.

[Masskid]

So what would stop the system from putting the best players on one team?? If they wanted to even the teams after that no luck sooo I'm going with nope

[Dishes]

Do you guys think we could try out forced auto-assign? We were talking about it in the server and thought that maybe, if it was given a try, that it would help out from the major team stack (Where the best players don't go against eachother, but with and rape the other team). Also, would stop people from sitting in spec to try and get a team they want. I'm open to feedback so post what you guys think.

I used to play on a server a few years ago that had an "!scramble" option, where if enough players typed that (much like RTV) it would scramble a random percentage of players (anywhere between 15% and 75% if I recall..) to the opposite team. It worked fairly well for the previous server, and I think it's an option to consider here considering how many people think team stacking is an issue. Personally, I think its better to play against more skilled players, I mean you can't get any better without playing against better, right?

[XX0wnsXY]

I used to play on a server a few years ago that had an "!scramble" option, where if enough players typed that (much like RTV) it would scramble a random percentage of players (anywhere between 15% and 75% if I recall..) to the opposite team. It worked fairly well for the previous server, and I think it's an option to consider here considering how many people think team stacking is an issue. Personally, I think its better to play against more skilled players, I mean you can't get any better without playing against better, right?

Interesting idea. Not sure its needed, but, interesting nonetheless.

[CYBER]

I used to play on a server a few years ago that had an "!scramble" option, where if enough players typed that (much like RTV) it would scramble a random percentage of players (anywhere between 15% and 75% if I recall..) to the opposite team. It worked fairly well for the previous server, and I think it's an option to consider here considering how many people think team stacking is an issue. Personally, I think its better to play against more skilled players, I mean you can't get any better without playing against better, right?

You're alright kid. You're alright.
Then again my standards got squashed recently with TheCat's appearance in the threads...
I second what owns said, to the letter.

[Masskid]

I used to play on a server a few years ago that had an "!scramble" option, where if enough players typed that (much like RTV) it would scramble a random percentage of players (anywhere between 15% and 75% if I recall..) to the opposite team. It worked fairly well for the previous server, and I think it's an option to consider here considering how many people think team stacking is an issue. Personally, I think its better to play against more skilled players, I mean you can't get any better without playing against better, right?

+1, it would be nice to have the option to scramble teams even if it isn't needed