View Poll Results: what do you want 2 see happen with the nade rule?

Voters
37. You may not vote on this poll
  • Keep the nade rule the same as it currently is

    6 16.22%
  • Revert back 2 the original way we had nades set up

    31 83.78%
Results 1 to 10 of 41

Thread: Nade Rule [Vote]

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. Default Nade Rule [Vote]

    alright. id love 2 hear every one's opinion regarding what you guys want 2 see happen with the nade rule.

    so we have 2 options, we can keep the nade rule as it currently is... which is...

    Option 1 - Keep the nade rule the same as it currently is now which allows specialty nades (poison, fire etc.) 2 be used on bombsites and hostage safe zones, but requires the user 2 properly place them so that the objective is still completable and not being obstructed.

    Or...

    Option 2 - Revert back 2 the original way we had nades set up on the server which was there is no specialty nades allowed on bombsites, or hostage safe zones what so ever.

    Maynard - The WCS Guy

  2. Default

    Revert back
    Spasm <ibis>: i thought mexicans came to murrica not canada
    Spasm <ibis>: :O
    Cyber ibis.a: free dental and health plan ^
    Cyber ibis.a: sry mmurica, u got outbid
    Cyber ibis.a: senor.
    Spasm <ibis>: its not truly free
    Spasm <ibis>: someone pays for it
    Spasm <ibis>: rich ppl
    Cyber ibis.a: exactly
    Cyber ibis.a: canadians
    Cyber ibis.a: i just get the free stuff
    Spasm <ibis>: typical mexican

  3. Default

    Opinion 2, Revert:

    It would solve a lot of crying. Is the way it was and should be. No more idiot admins / players confusing shit, starting trouble, pushing the rule to its breaking point, and generally just make the situation easier to handle all together as there wouldn't be a situation to begin with.
    Make all your last demands for I will forsake you and I'll meet your eyes for the very first time, for the very last.

    maynard <ibis>: they are awkward and last 2 damn long. I prefer thinner smaller ones

  4. Default

    Id say keep it just for the hell hunter race, this race is hard to play as it is, and sometimes only playable on few maps, reverting back would even "Nerf" it more as you would have to pick your nade spots even more carefully. Anyways, the fire nades or poison nades don't do any or very little damage, this is just another tactic IMO, same as molecule using his ulty on the bomb.

    I know there is few issues with this, but honestly almost never anything major and very uncommon in general that, since hell hunter isn't used on every map.

  5. Default

    Revert

  6. Default

    Its not the damage that matters, the noise you produce when you walk through the smoke and fire, combined with the slow pace you go does make putting this nades on the objective area more unfair than annoying. Question though, does reverting the rule also include nade spam of objectives by santa?
    I hit Brett right in the feels.

  7. Default

    nade spamming objectives is never allowed.

    Maynard - The WCS Guy

  8. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dj panda View Post
    Revert
    QFT. You have to be able to get to the objective and diffuse easily when someone else is causing a distraction...then bam...cluck cluck cluck...*random fire* dead.

  9. Default

    I'm making this post on my phone, but it's from Android, so legit. Looks like a revert win so far.
    Make all your last demands for I will forsake you and I'll meet your eyes for the very first time, for the very last.

    maynard <ibis>: they are awkward and last 2 damn long. I prefer thinner smaller ones

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •