Constitutional Rights

[thecat]

anex for the win!

[-=Toy=-=Québec=-FR]

You don't need a bushmaster for hunting.
You don't need a 100 round magazine for hunting.
No one is trying to ban ALL guns.
I like hunting but I would not need 100 32 cal rounds to kill a dear.
You can't overthrow the US government with the weapons open to the public so don't pull the I need the guns to fight an abusive government crap.

Related ?

ffff.PNG

[Assassin]

Related ?

ffff.PNG

Lol dude he's obviously over 13..

[-=Toy=-=Québec=-FR]

Lol dude he's obviously over 13..

oh sorry *fail*

[ZERO]

Given the point of the right to be armed is to defend against a tyrannical government I think the real issue is that we do not have enough tank and artillery ownership.

[StarsMine]

... What in the hell of fuck.
Hell just froze over, Cat said something intelligent.

When the time comes to over throw the government just mod your guns and gun cartages to 100 round clips. We are a nation of DIYers and many mechanical engineers so that would be a non-problem. Until then for home use you should not need more then 6 bullets, when hunting you don't need anything more then bolt action.

Personally an assult rifile that is in semi automatic and has a normal/gimped clip is fine. I dont see much of a reason to ban those, a sawed off shotgun or an SMG is much better for close quarter massacre, and thats how its usually done when they happen.

[Rapedollar$]

Given the point of the right to be armed is to defend against a tyrannical government I think the real issue is that we do not have enough tank and artillery ownership.

true but in the event that we had to defend ourselves against a tyrannical government a portion of the current standing military would surely side with the constitutionalists.

i am however surprised how few people actually know the 2nd amendment isn't about keeping a hunting rifle.

[brett friggin favre]

there are plenty of people trying to get rid of guns altogether. people in power, maybe not...but people nonetheless. they have groups. and vans. and lots and lots of pot.

[acolyte_to_jippity]

Lol dude he's obviously over 13..

technically correct, he's in the 8th grade, so 14.

true but in the event that we had to defend ourselves against a tyrannical government a portion of the current standing military would surely side with the constitutionalists.

i am however surprised how few people actually know the 2nd amendment isn't about keeping a hunting rifle.

A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

what alot of people don't seem to understand is that there are two seperate clauses in that amendment. The fact that a militia is necessary to the security of a FREE state (protecting against the government), and then the part about owning and bearing guns shall not be infringed. too many people claim that only militia or army/police should have guns because the amendment only talks about militia people, but they're idiots.

[Meltdown]

People still think they live in the time that there where cowboys and there where baddies around every corner that want to shoot u death and steal your money. people don't need to have semi auto guns in there home. America needs to look in the mirror for once and accept that they need to change, must be a word everyone is so afraid of. the american dream is over or rather it never existed. why cannot they accept it that the more guns is just asking for more death people. I'm just shocked that there actually children death now because those peeps are ignorant.