Page 13 of 15 FirstFirst ... 3 11 12 13 14 15 LastLast
Results 121 to 130 of 142

Thread: Constitutional Rights

  1. Default

    let's just...not rage so hard that we shoot people. k? k.

    Through the darkness of futures past,
    The magician longs to see
    One chants out between two worlds:
    Fire, walk with me.

  2. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by brett friggin favre View Post
    let's just...not rage so hard that we shoot people. k? k.
    Or just go back to the way things used to be, where men drank and beat their wives, and everyone was happy.
    Quote Originally Posted by maynard View Post
    Nem, if you want to make racist jokes and shit all the time, fine.
    http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2010/07/02/nemesis/nemesis-jpg/

  3. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DJ_MikeyRevile View Post
    p.p.s. I apologize for the triplet post, the internet out here in Afghanistan where i am fighting to protect those rights you wish my country had never had for 200+ years, is shit poor slow.
    From a Ron Paul, I'm appaulled! Get sniper hill! You pay $90 (for 50 kb/s) instead of $100 (20 kb/s)

  4. Default

    No no no, it's not that fighting is included for one and not another. It's that assault, without a weapon, resulting in serious bodily injury or in Canada, Assault 1, is included in the Canadian statistic. It is NOT included in the American statistic. So if I went out and kicked a guy in the nose until he was in a coma for 2 months, it wouldn't affect the American stat, but if Cyber did it, it would include in the Canadian statistic, plus he'd go to jail for being a Mexican that committed a hate crime.
    Quote Originally Posted by maynard View Post
    your helmet is being shipped.

  5. Default

    What you all are also forgetting is that in large urban and rural areas in America the police will not be called for many violent crimes. Crime that is not reported is not included in the statistics. The school of thought with these areas is that police will only exacerbate problems if not cause unnecessary problems for the reporting individual. Anyways, comparing which countries are more violent than one another is silly as everyone here can agree that crime is reported differently country to country.

    Another issue, which is why I questioned Star's stance, is that violence as defined by the W.H.O. is not congruent with what is reported as violent crime. Sexual assault can be a misdemeanor and by Star's stance that is not violent however as defined by the W.H.O. it is in fact violence.

  6. #126

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anex View Post
    From a Ron Paul, I'm appaulled! Get sniper hill! You pay $90 (for 50 kb/s) instead of $100 (20 kb/s)
    it is sniper hill... its still shitty with how many people ue this one router
    Personal reform

  7. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Penis シ View Post
    No no no, it's not that fighting is included for one and not another. It's that assault, without a weapon, resulting in serious bodily injury or in Canada, Assault 1, is included in the Canadian statistic. It is NOT included in the American statistic. So if I went out and kicked a guy in the nose until he was in a coma for 2 months, it wouldn't affect the American stat, but if Cyber did it, it would include in the Canadian statistic, plus he'd go to jail for being a Mexican that committed a hate crime.
    Putting someone in a coma would never be common assault, that's aggravated assault which doesn't need the element of consent to be issued.

    Quote Originally Posted by SCRIBBLE View Post
    Sexual assault can be a misdemeanor and by Star's stance that is not violent however as defined by the W.H.O. it is in fact violence.
    I'm pretty sure you're wrong on that one, as sexual assault is always an indictable offense. Don't mistake a hybrid offense as a lower conviction, it's done that way so there are more opportunities to arrest someone for committing it.
    Quote Originally Posted by maynard View Post
    Nem, if you want to make racist jokes and shit all the time, fine.
    http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2010/07/02/nemesis/nemesis-jpg/

  8. Default

    Right, Nem. But that isn't included in the "violent crimes" statistic in the U.S.
    Quote Originally Posted by maynard View Post
    your helmet is being shipped.

  9. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Meltdown View Post
    I don't believe those statistics that's different, Do u guys believe everything they say? The thing is they want you to believe that. The real statistics are way different but they will never tell you that.
    No just what you say lol

    chu2_09_02.jpg



  10. Default

    hyouka_02_01.jpg

    Quote Originally Posted by DJ_MikeyRevile View Post
    It is a constitutional right for Americans to own firearms, not to protect themselves from terrorists.. but to allow the citizens to defend themselves from a tyrannical government. The reasoning behind these proposed bans is due to politicians blaming the item used to kill rather then holding the individual accountable. A criminal is a criminal, criminals break laws. Creating new laws will not prevent them from breaking them. If a deranged mentally ill person wants to kill people, he will do so. That will not change by outlawing firearms. You not only have your punch line facts wrong, you do not understand how a ban like this would effect this country. Police men and women to soldiers who swore an oath to protect our constitutional rights will not stand idly by while the government takes them away.

    I leave you with this to think about...

    If you hand wrote a nasty letter to your boss that resulted in you getting fired from your job, was it your fault or the pens?
    amagami_22_02.jpg

    Hopefully now:

    natsumachi_02_01.jpg

    And not:

    oniai_07_06.jpg

    Attachment 0



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •