Page 6 of 8 FirstFirst ... 4 5 6 7 8 LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 74

Thread: Help meh with new computer por favor...

  1. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grits View Post
    Just wanted to throw this in here for the AMD fanboys: ( I used to be one, I know how you feel, you miss the days of yore)

    http://anandtech.com/bench/Product/362?vs=677

    This is a comparison of a lowly Core i3, trading blows with AMDs top tier Quad... the i3 is cheaper

    On a super budget gaming rig, the A seires would make sense... not here



    http://anandtech.com/bench/CPU/343
    Thanks for posting this. I knew my stance on Intel versus AMD in today's market was correct, as I'd done the research myself before I built my new rig, but I was too lazy to actually provide sources.

  2. Default

    Intel has better thermal protection for thier chips as well, that alone is all I need to hear. You never know when that can save your ass after your cooling system fails 1 day.



  3. #53

    Default

    you miss the point. I never said AMD was always better then intel. Im simply saying that when building a dedicated gaming rig for a decent price AMD should be your CPU of choice. here is an example: http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?...t-Core&id=1780

    Even the AMD FX-8350 is cheaper then an i5 and is ranked 40 in HIGH end CPU's Most cpus ranked above it are CPUs meant for servers, ranging from $400 to $4000.

    bottom line, in this example you can get a CPU for $179 that is benchmarked 100 ranks higher then an i5 which i cannot find below $199
    Personal reform

  4. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DJ_MikeyRevile View Post
    you miss the point. I never said AMD was always better then intel. Im simply saying that when building a dedicated gaming rig for a decent price AMD should be your CPU of choice. here is an example: http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?...t-Core&id=1780

    Even the AMD FX-8350 is cheaper then an i5 and is ranked 40 in HIGH end CPU's Most cpus ranked above it are CPUs meant for servers, ranging from $400 to $4000.

    bottom line, in this example you can get a CPU for $179 that is benchmarked 100 ranks higher then an i5 which i cannot find below $199
    Seriously Mikey, if you think AMD is good for gaming, take a look at these benchmarks. This is a comparison of the chip you mentioned (AMD FX 8350, $179 today on Newegg, $20 coupon) versus an Intel i5 3750K ($219 on Newegg today).

    http://anandtech.com/bench/Product/697?vs=701

    Scroll to the bottom and look at performance in the games they list. The Intel chip destroys the AMD. It's not even a comparison. If you compare the other chips, especially at the top tiers, you'll see that Intel has AMD beat by even bigger margins. Like I said earlier, AMD is way behind. The single benchmark you showed, and that I looked up in 3DMark 2011, for the 8350 seems to be really good, unfortunately a single benchmark rarely paints the whole processing picture.

    Intel wouldn't be in business selling processors at a bloated price while AMD had amazing processors that were super cheap. That isn't how the market works. If that were the case, I'd have an AMD, they would be on top and we'd be dissing Intel right now.

  5. #55

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jwtemp View Post
    Seriously Mikey, if you think AMD is good for gaming, take a look at these benchmarks. This is a comparison of the chip you mentioned (AMD FX 8350, $179 today on Newegg, $20 coupon) versus an Intel i5 3750K ($219 on Newegg today).

    http://anandtech.com/bench/Product/697?vs=701

    Scroll to the bottom and look at performance in the games they list. The Intel chip destroys the AMD. It's not even a comparison. If you compare the other chips, especially at the top tiers, you'll see that Intel has AMD beat by even bigger margins. Like I said earlier, AMD is way behind. The single benchmark you showed, and that I looked up in 3DMark 2011, for the 8350 seems to be really good, unfortunately a single benchmark rarely paints the whole processing picture.

    Intel wouldn't be in business selling processors at a bloated price while AMD had amazing processors that were super cheap. That isn't how the market works. If that were the case, I'd have an AMD, they would be on top and we'd be dissing Intel right now.
    Bottom line, AMD is for bargin shoppers trying to save a buck. If what everyone here says holds any value. What intel processor and MoBo would be recommended for someone with a 3000 dollar budget. Do AMD GPU's even work with intel? Carm should buy a GFX Titan.
    Personal reform

  6. Default

    380923_10201320972330416_1615772369_n.jpg

    230 not 359 at the microcenter here.

    Thinking about this gpu? thoughts?

    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16814125423

    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16814130810

    or that

    Im 90% certain I want this board
    Last edited by Carmichal; 05-13-2013 at 09:32 PM.

  7. Default

    Woo! 3770K on the cheapz! Best CPU for the money right now (if you buy at Microcenter like a boss! )

    As for the video card, again, it's going to boil down to preference.

    First, I'd recommend the EVGA GTX 670 [http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16814130787] over the Gigabyte you listed. Same price, tiny bit better performance. Second, I've compared two Zotac brands on Tom's Hardware, but they should be almost identical to the comparison of the EVGA GTX 670 FTW and EVGA GTX 660 Ti SuperClocked. In case you aren't sure what you're looking at here, this is imply average FPS values for the two cards at Ultra settings (everything maxed and all effects enabled in DirectX 11):

    http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/2...d%5B5726%5D=on

    Looking at these numbers, the 660 Ti is clearly the better value, but the GTX 670 is clearly the more powerful card. If you want to play on Ultra Max High l33t settings though, perhaps that extra $90 is worth it. You'll also be playing games on High settings for longer with the GTX 670. If it were my choice to make, I'd spring for it, but if you only need High quality settings, go with the 660 Ti. I'm just a graphics guy, myself.

    Getting closer now!

  8. Default

    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16835118046

    I have only heard good things about this brand of heatsink fan coolers... since I will not be overclocking more than likely it should keep it icey enough.

  9. Default

    I dont mind zalman, but I dont know about that cooler, I dont care much for the idea of all copper. All it will do is degrade without a plating to protect it. that time you touched it, eched, that air, oxidizing it....

    For a cheep cooler I highly recomend either the xigmitec gaia(actually performs the same as the 212) or cooler master hyper 212. A step up would be the dark knight.


    Quote Originally Posted by Zero
    So... what your trying to tell me is that you saw a spherical square?

  10. Default

    Facepalm eminent.

    Hyper 212 is fucking great.

    My uncle has had a similar Zalman for 3 years (no cleaning LOL) in a humid basement, no oxidation.

    The oxidation has barely any noticeable impact (ON AIR) on actual heat transfer. You may get a bit of a green discolor after a long time but this is usually only if you are in a decently humid environment and is cleanable. A great almost pure copper heatsink will rarely oxidize if kept "clean".

    Get some Silver thermal paste!
    Make all your last demands for I will forsake you and I'll meet your eyes for the very first time, for the very last.

    maynard <ibis>: they are awkward and last 2 damn long. I prefer thinner smaller ones

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •