When you try to prove your role doesn't exist, yes, you're suspicious. When you claim something that doesn't seem to line up with your claimed role, yes, you are suspicious. When you stick with your reasons for voting for someone long after they've been proven incorrect, yes, you're suspicious. When you make demands with no reasons to follow through, yes, you're suspicious.
As for lynching AFKers, you're 100% correct. It didn't work in Roman BECAUSE WE DIDN'T DO IT. The previous game, I'd have to look, but I'll take your word for it.
Yes, I said a similar thing about you. Because it's true. We can let others decide for themselves. However, when a townie decides to stop playing for the town, and working for his own agenda, why would you follow him? Sometimes, lynching a townie can be the right play. Look at Nem in wcs or Taz in here.
Everyone else, can't you see what I'm doing? Not wanting to be lynched by someone who brings nothing to the table! For reasons which "will only be revealed if things go his way".
Originally Posted by ZERO
Register To Reply
