Quote Originally Posted by jwtemp View Post
'Clear' is quite a relative and subjective term.
"clear" evidence of hacks -
dayum son, could he do dat shit without external assistance?
shit naw! dat nigga prefire like a mothafucka, aint no way he knew dat cat was there holmes!

as opposed to

dayum son, could he do dat shit without external assistance?
shit yea! nigga be on radar, makin all dem footsteps n shit, gave his ass away

enough of situation 1 = ban. we can't just ban without sufficient evidence...we can't ban cuz it looks like someone may be hacking, we have to know they're hacking or we'd be banning people left and right for no reason. shit i woulda been banned after a few months here, if that.