I play cs with a helmet on Abuse

[TheLittlestHobo]

Either way, admins that judge whether a spot is unfair should give people a warning to not go there next round. I don't think it's fair to start burning them and whatnot without a one round warning in advance. I certainly would not have it done to me. The same goes with the Res' admin abuse topic.

[demonater10]

Either way, admins that judge whether a spot is unfair should give people a warning to not go there next round. I don't think it's fair to start burning them and whatnot without a one round warning in advance. I certainly would not have it done to me. The same goes with the Res' admin abuse topic.

If it burns when you urinate, does that mean you have Chlamydia?

[inthebutt]

I want to address a little problem. I want to know the official ruling on admins declaring a spot fair/unfair on a map. For example right now as of 5:36 pm Mountain Time, the ZM server is on the map zm_scrapyard_b3. I need to know if the tubes on this map are fair or unfair. I think it is unfair because not everyone knows how to get into these tubes. It does take some practice as silent stated. It is unfair to the rest of the players that don't know how to get in there and tag the human(s) inside that tube. As an admin, I thought it was an admins role to keep the game fair (I could be wrong cause it doesn't say that in the TOS). I'd figure this would be the best way to resolve this situation. If two or more admins declare a spot unfair, can it be enforced ingame even though its not written in the rules???

[๖ReS]

Inthebutt is right. that should be a server rule.
However it should no be enforced while said player is in that spot.
After the round ends, then the spot can fairly be deemed "unfair"
Ty inthebut