Supernatural Mafia

[Passarelli]

No, it is saying that I had already posted an argument that shows there is no good reason to vote wolf today.

[DJ_MikeyRevile]

and yes... almighty dense one, part of my insult was suggesting that you failed a grade in elementary.

*facepalms*

- - - Updated - - -

how does this sound, you suggest plans of action without seeming like your pushing agenda. It will make you look less scummy and i wont be so aggravated by you.
Lets whip out that Iq of rock+ and move on.

As i have stated many times before in regards to your loaded opinion, i wouldnt rush a lynch on wolf now but i also wouldn't brush it under the table.

Being the wolf has alot more experience playing this game then you, im going to trust he comes back with something to say that clarifies his reasoning for being lynched today.

- - - Updated - - -

being that* wolf*

[Passarelli]

Unless you have evidence to support a statement, it is opinion "logical" or not.

Since you didn't look up the difference:

Deductive reasoning, also deductive logic or logical deduction or, informally, "top-down" logic, is the process of reasoning from one or more general statements (premises) to reach a logically certain conclusion.
Deductive reasoning links premises with conclusions. If all premises are true, the terms are clear, and the rules of deductive logic are followed, then the conclusion reached is necessarily true.


In general, an opinion is a judgment, viewpoint, or statement about matters commonly considered to be subjective, i.e. based on that which is less than absolutely certain, and is the result of emotion or interpretation of facts.

The only assumption I made in my argument is that there are 3 mafia. If you feel that is subjective enough to call a deductive argument an 'opinion'--well, I guess I apologize.

- - - Updated - - -

and yes... almighty dense one, part of my insult was suggesting that you failed a grade in elementary.

By the way, I love how you play off your mistake. ^_^

[DJ_MikeyRevile]

Since you didn't look up the difference:



The only assumption I made in my argument is that there are 3 mafia. If you feel that is subjective enough to call a deductive argument an 'opinion'--well, I guess I apologize.

your problem is that you fail to understand how this game works in relation to how confirmation within this game works. For all we know, wolf could be jester or afa bomb or any other role that wins via a lynch.
With the above said, what you presented, Subjective logic.

Your logic is based of the premis that wolf isnt lying, when in fact he could easily be lying about his role. This is the point i was trying to make. But.. you happen to be an arrogant bastard.

now, back to the game, enough school ground bullshit.

- - - Updated - - -

no, not playing off a mistake dumbass. You simply lack the nessecary braincells to distinguish a clever insult vs someone being lesser then you. Perhaps i send a drone to your house to pop that inflated ego balloon above your head.

[Passarelli]

no, not playing off a mistake dumbass. You simply lack the nessecary braincells to distinguish a clever insult vs someone being lesser then you. Perhaps i send a drone to your house to pop that inflated ego balloon above your head.

Still playing it off and you added a physical threat! Good for you. Such a big strong man on the internet.

Nem, the person who makes the kill is likely decided by mafia each night. If you were to block them, it would stop the kill. That is how I would mod it personally. Your role isn't useless anyway, as it makes a good protective role. This setup was not designed to have 100% protection on the cop (had a deputy, faith healer, and bodyguard). You could protect Wolf so he doesn't die at night, me if a double vote would give us an extra day, or even Kionay to try to stop the kill.

Nem, after looking through the rules and such, I can't find where a jailkeeper could possibly roleblock a mafia and stop the faction kill.

The Mafia can, as a faction, kill one player at Night.

[DJ_MikeyRevile]

Still playing it off and you added a physical threat! Good for you. Such a big strong man on the internet.



Nem, after looking through the rules and such, I can't find where a jailkeeper could possibly roleblock a mafia and stop the faction kill.

sigh, your stupidity is tiring. No, a threat is something i say i will in fact do. Perhaps, you missed the word perhaps at the beginning of that sentence.

- - - Updated - - -

and yes, a roleblocker/jailer can stop a mafia kill. lets say mafia is goon + God Father + roleblocker. Typically, both the god father and the goon have kill abilities. However, only one kill can be made at night. If nem blocks the person making the kill, he blocks the kill.

Again this is assuming nem is actually a town aligned roleblocker.

- - - Updated - - -

and given that every single night, kion made an investigation and mafia made a kill, nems claim is questionable. However, im less concerned with his alignment as he is most likley telling the truth, even if he appears to be withholding information....

[Passarelli]

[QUOTE=DJ_MikeyRevile;181043]sigh, your stupidity is tiring. No, a threat is something i say i will in fact do. Perhaps, you missed the word perhaps at the beginning of that sentence.

Threat - a statement of an intention to inflict pain, injury, damage, or other hostile action on someone in retribution for something done or not done.

Perhaps - used to express uncertainty or possibility. Used when one does not wish to be too definite or assertive in the expression of an opinion.

Saying perhaps before a threat doesn't negate the threat, simply showing that it may or may not happen.

Saying perhaps before a threat is redundant, as a threat doesn't equate the action and is itself simply voicing the intent.

Also, since we are still going with this:

your problem is that you fail to understand how this game works in relation to how confirmation within this game works. For all we know, wolf could be jester or afa bomb or any other role that wins via a lynch.
With the above said, what you presented, Subjective logic.

I don't see how if you change Wolf from Hunter to a jester or a bomb would make it a good idea to lynch him, which makes what you said a moot point. The only way your argument about "wolf could be lying" that would damage my argument is if you think he is Scum. That is the only way it'd be a good idea at this point to lynch him today.

I guess if you get down to it, it is subjective. Sorry about that. If you still think that Wolf is anything BUT a town aligned Hunter, then you might want to go back through the Cyber Fiasco.

By the way, I'm curious now. Was it kindergarten you were held back from? I could see where you could have some issues getting along with other children.

[DJ_MikeyRevile]

[QUOTE=Passarelli;181044]

sigh, your stupidity is tiring. No, a threat is something i say i will in fact do. Perhaps, you missed the word perhaps at the beginning of that sentence.

Threat - a statement of an intention to inflict pain, injury, damage, or other hostile action on someone in retribution for something done or not done.

Perhaps - used to express uncertainty or possibility. Used when one does not wish to be too definite or assertive in the expression of an opinion.

Saying perhaps before a threat doesn't negate the threat, simply showing that it may or may not happen.

Saying perhaps before a threat is redundant, as a threat doesn't equate the action and is itself simply voicing the intent.

Also, since we are still going with this:



I don't see how if you change Wolf from Hunter to a jester or a bomb would make it a good idea to lynch him, which makes what you said a moot point. The only way your argument about "wolf could be lying" that would damage my argument is if you think he is Scum. That is the only way it'd be a good idea at this point to lynch him today.

I guess if you get down to it, it is subjective. Sorry about that. If you still think that Wolf is anything BUT a town aligned Hunter, then you might want to go back through the Cyber Fiasco.

By the way, I'm curious now. Was it kindergarten you were held back from? I could see where you could have some issues getting along with other children.

Opps caught me, PERHAPS i apologize for threatening your ego balloon.


and again, my point isnt moot because you keep fighting that your "logic" is based off wolf being the role he claims to be. The reason i brought that up was to prove you wrong in regards to your "logic."
Again, since it is appearant that you lack the ability to read past posts, i have been reiterating that i do not think we should rush a vote on wolf and also not to completely forget that this option is there for us.

- - - Updated - - -

p.s. apart from everything else you cant seem to do rioght.. you add to the list with "inability to quote another on forums"

[Passarelli]

Says the guy who doesn't think I'm a double voter. Hilarious.

- - - Updated - - -

Sorry, I noticed when it went up. The /quote got deleted when I was formatting. Can't edit to fix it.

[DJ_MikeyRevile]

Says the guy who doesn't think I'm a double voter. Hilarious.

- - - Updated - - -

Sorry, I noticed when it went up. The /quote got deleted when I was formatting. Can't edit to fix it.

i never said i did not think you were a double voter. perhaps you let your emotion take the bench for a few and refresh a few pages back.

ASside from that, i get emails of every post and you sir, edited your post with a quote from me.

- - - Updated - - -

correction, you edited much more then a quote, but everything bellow it as well.