Page 21 of 143 FirstFirst ... 11 19 20 21 22 23 31 71 121 ... LastLast
Results 201 to 210 of 1428

Thread: Supernatural Mafia

  1. Default

    Right and by lynching Stan we obtain NO NEW information going into Night 1, kionay, essentially it IS a "nolynch" because we'd find out that he was a VT in the first place, which we already know. Going for a lynch on someone playing scummy from the onset is ideal and the point to this game, isn't it?

    I mean it is a gamble because, Nemesis, MAY just be playing scummy because he's a cumcovered vietnamese midget prostitute, but if we give him the benefit of the doubt EVERY game, just because that's how he is in general, he can use that against us.

    Here's what we know:

    - STAN is most likely a VT or just a townie with a minimal role like "Innocent Child".
    - SIN is a "claimed" VT as Rufus, who has yet to be counter-claimed.
    - NEMESIS who has been trying to start a bandwagon to lynch SIN since he claimed, then proceeded to vote STAN (VT) to hop on the train with everyone else going for a "policy lynch"

    Most of our votes have been against another Townie. Where the fuck is your logic, people?

    For the day going as long as it has, we will learn nothing from it. WE GET NOTHING. I'd rather gamble and lose than go for the safe option and lose anyway.

    If we lynch STAN we guarantee (2) dead Townies going into Day 2. We lynch Nemesis, it could go either way but I just have a feeling he's mafia.


    4) Use admin privileges sparingly and appropriately.


  2. Default

    Unvote

    Lots of valid points being driven. Holding my vote till something more comes up.
    In-Game name: †Jesus†

  3. Default

    And before Nem focuses on the part of me "just having a feeling", I gave my reasoning for WHY I have that feeling in earlier posts.


    4) Use admin privileges sparingly and appropriately.


  4. Default

    I understand where you are coming from, the unfortunate thing about lynching Nem atm, despite how much I would love to for the sheer fact I don't like him, but he played the exact same way last game and he was a town vigilante. So with that being said, we need someone to lynch but I would prefer more evidence if we are taking out Nem. (By no means am I on Nem's side nor would I ever be)
    In-Game name: †Jesus†

  5. #205

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sin View Post
    Right and by lynching Stan we obtain NO NEW information going into Night 1, kionay, essentially it IS a "nolynch" because we'd find out that he was a VT in the first place, which we already know. Going for a lynch on someone playing scummy from the onset is ideal and the point to this game, isn't it?

    I mean it is a gamble because, Nemesis, MAY just be playing scummy because he's a cumcovered vietnamese midget prostitute, but if we give him the benefit of the doubt EVERY game, just because that's how he is in general, he can use that against us.

    Here's what we know:

    - STAN is most likely a VT or just a townie with a minimal role like "Innocent Child".
    - SIN is a "claimed" VT as Rufus, who has yet to be counter-claimed.
    - NEMESIS who has been trying to start a bandwagon to lynch SIN since he claimed, then proceeded to vote STAN (VT) to hop on the train with everyone else going for a "policy lynch"

    Most of our votes have been against another Townie. Where the fuck is your logic, people?

    For the day going as long as it has, we will learn nothing from it. WE GET NOTHING. I'd rather gamble and lose than go for the safe option and lose anyway.

    If we lynch STAN we guarantee (2) dead Townies going into Day 2. We lynch Nemesis, it could go either way but I just have a feeling he's mafia.
    all good points, except i don't agree that lynching Stan is the same as a nolynch since there is potential (be is small i suppose) that Stan could be that extra vote we need later, since he is VT and not.. nothing, then he has the potential to be worthwhile, which gives him some value that we lose by lynching him (where as nolynch is 100% guareteed no net loss or gain of value in VT/Mafia population)

    his inactivity makes him of little value.. but that value is non zero, so i don't think we should lynch stan or sin, or nolynch, i agree with what you said about nemesis though

    maybe if nem is VT and gets lynched then at least in future games he'll stop acting like how we'd expect mafia to act.... just maybe
    A programming genius called HEAP
    Had trouble in getting to sleep
    So he made his lambs troup
    through a huge FOR-NEXT loop
    FOR 1 TO 10000: NEXT sheep.

  6. Default

    What I mean by it "being the same as a nolynch" is that we will GAIN NO NEW information and go into DAY 2 still blind.


    4) Use admin privileges sparingly and appropriately.


  7. Default

    Look at last game where we lynched a townie day one, used that information combined with night information to lynch mafia on the two consecutive days.

    If you choose to lynch Sin then you will either not lynch a Town power role or you will lynch an anti-town role. Both are a win for the town.

    If you choose to lynch Stan you are most likely lynching a non-power role Town, or possibly a third party character, which could most likely be anti-town. You are removing someone who will not contribute while being alive. The information gained is the same that was gained last game.

    Choosing you lynch someone else, seeing as how there are two other VTs, gives you a huge chance to hit a power role. Since Town always outnumbers anti-town, and you've eliminated two VTs, you are at an extremely high chance of hitting a useful Town role, something that will greatly hinder the town operating at night or their ability to openly discuss information during the following days.

    Sin is one of two things: Mafia or fucking retarded.
    Quote Originally Posted by maynard View Post
    Nem, if you want to make racist jokes and shit all the time, fine.
    http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2010/07/02/nemesis/nemesis-jpg/

  8. Default

    What's retarded about wanting more information? You're pushing for lynching a Townie, because it's a "SAFE" choice apparently.

    And why do we continue to reference other games? They don't fucking matter! This game is the one that concerns me, not whatever the fuck you did in the last one. Continuing to bring it up is just an excuse and not a valid reason for WANTING TO LYNCH TOWNIES!

    TL;DR: Nemesis is scum.


    4) Use admin privileges sparingly and appropriately.


  9. #209

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sin View Post
    What's retarded about wanting more information? You're pushing for lynching a Townie, because it's a "SAFE" choice apparently.

    And why do we continue to reference other games? They don't fucking matter! This game is the one that concerns me, not whatever the fuck you did in the last one. Continuing to bring it up is just an excuse and not a valid reason for WANTING TO LYNCH TOWNIES!

    TL;DR: Nemesis is scum.
    Remember, you could just as easily be lying about your role. Dont forget.. you claimed but you are not confirmed
    Personal reform

  10. Default

    The whole thing comes down to this:

    Sin wants to lynch a powerful Townie

    I don't

    Pick your sides from there. Note I haven't voted for Sin at all, while he is the one trying to start bandwagons for no reason.

    Again, Sin is retarded or Mafia.
    Quote Originally Posted by maynard View Post
    Nem, if you want to make racist jokes and shit all the time, fine.
    http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2010/07/02/nemesis/nemesis-jpg/

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •