Supernatural Mafia

[Passarelli]

Pass, as I mention, the only one who "only commented to bus Nem" is actually Locust. Also, the only person to be in both votes is actually OB. Saying you'd try to stop a wagon on him seems to suggest you DO trust him. What exactly are you saying?

Sorry for not clarifying earlier, I knew he voted in both but I forgot he was the only one to do so and thus didn't realize I should.

I was waiting to see what OB did. I figured it was a ploy of some sort to gain more information--information we desperately need. That is why I said I'd try to stop a wagon, and did not actively try to stop people from fingering him (interesting who did, however).

I figured OB was trying to bait some scum so I didn't want to say anything--and if anything try to make it seem like voting for him might be a possibility. That said, I figure that since he pointed out the hints he gave made him feel a little uncomfortable with the amount of pressure he was getting so I wanted to allay his fears. I also still am not sure if he is lying or not about what he has hinted at. Now we wait and see if anyone calls bullshit. If someone did or still does, one of them would be scum and the cop would know who to lynch tomorrow. If not, well, I hope we don't have anymore werewolves. It might be worth considering investigating him to confirm--but again, I'm still a bit of a nub as to who makes promising investigation targets.

It was just a mistake I made that ended up not changing anything other then making Cyber suspicious of me.

I'd still like to hear some input from those who haven't said much. Hopefully something will happen by the time I wake up.

- - - Updated - - -

Well, yeah. Just saw Cyber reply before I did. Sorry again for the noob mistake >.<

[DJ_MikeyRevile]

Sorry for not clarifying earlier, I knew he voted in both but I forgot he was the only one to do so and thus didn't realize I should.

I was waiting to see what OB did. I figured it was a ploy of some sort to gain more information--information we desperately need. That is why I said I'd try to stop a wagon, and did not actively try to stop people from fingering him (interesting who did, however).

I figured OB was trying to bait some scum so I didn't want to say anything--and if anything try to make it seem like voting for him might be a possibility. That said, I figure that since he pointed out the hints he gave made him feel a little uncomfortable with the amount of pressure he was getting so I wanted to allay his fears. I also still am not sure if he is lying or not about what he has hinted at. Now we wait and see if anyone calls bullshit. If someone did or still does, one of them would be scum and the cop would know who to lynch tomorrow. If not, well, I hope we don't have anymore werewolves. It might be worth considering investigating him to confirm--but again, I'm still a bit of a nub as to who makes promising investigation targets.

It was just a mistake I made that ended up not changing anything other then making Cyber suspicious of me.

I'd still like to hear some input from those who haven't said much. Hopefully something will happen by the time I wake up.

- - - Updated - - -

Well, yeah. Just saw Cyber reply before I did. Sorry again for the noob mistake >.<

this must be your first game?
I did not try and bus stan. I gave him time, hell, i even posted that i was going to wait. I pushed it off for as long as i could but you know what? We get absolutely fucking no where sitting in a day phase for a week in real time, he was not responsive and showed clear disdain towards the game when he did make a post. He edited a post and gave 2 shits about it being against the rules.

As for your logic? Your first few posts made any sense, broken english and rambling. It wasnt tell after he was lynched that i got to see your other one, the last one that made a tiny bit more sense. As im sure you are aware.. i have a job that takes about bettween 10-12 hours of my day.

- - - Updated - - -

you should be looking at the people who quick voted stan and kept that vote for over a 24 hour period.

- - - Updated - - -

and even THEN! he was not a confirmed townie and he was just as likley to turn up mafia as ANY one else we could have lynched. I think you are focused on the wrong things, you cant see a lynch that happens to be on a townie and immediatly assume everyone involved with that lynch somehow magically knew he was town and were out to kill them because of it.

[Passarelli]

this must be your first game?

As for your logic? Your first few posts made any sense, broken english and rambling. It wasnt tell after he was lynched that i got to see your other one, the last one that made a tiny bit more sense.

Yes, this is indeed my first game. I have played a similar game about 15 years ago on a bus on the way home from a soccer game but it was much less complex.

I'm glad you think that my first few posts made any sense--I'm sorry if I ramble.

The post I am refering to is this one:

Rather then being pointlessly insulting, why not simply poke holes in the logic.

My logic being:

Day 1 policy lynch means no usable voting data. No voting data means investigators are ham-stringed and less likely to have usable data for day 2. Thus, night 1 is not being used efficiently.

Day 1 semi-random lynch gives decent data which investigators can use to zero in on a suspect. If they still miss their mark, even if a policy lynch takes place during day 2, they can still use the data from the previous day.

Which of the two seems preferable to you?

Again, let me know if I am misunderstanding how this works. I am a newbie after all.

- - - Updated - - -

*the previous day for night 2.

Is this the one you think made a tiny bit more sense? The one where I spelled out a situation that is pretty similar to the one we are in now?

You posted 5 times after I asked that--one of which was your vote for Stan.

- - - Updated - - -

Okay, really got to sleep now. Night all! Hopefully someone will have something great for us this morning.

[DJ_MikeyRevile]

Yes, this is indeed my first game. I have played a similar game about 15 years ago on a bus on the way home from a soccer game but it was much less complex.

I'm glad you think that my first few posts made any sense--I'm sorry if I ramble.

The post I am refering to is this one:


Is this the one you think made a tiny bit more sense? The one where I spelled out a situation that is pretty similar to the one we are in now?

You posted 5 times after I asked that--one of which was your vote for Stan.

- - - Updated - - -

Okay, really got to sleep now. Night all! Hopefully someone will have something great for us this morning.

i thought that one was first thing D2.

I still would argue your point, as it dosnt make alot of sense nor do you have a clear understanding of how this game works. Stan still had the ability to respond to the voting that was going on and either soft claim or hard claim to save himself from a vote. This makes your first scenario mute. Your second scenario dosnt make any sense. Lynching stan was just as random as lynching any one else, only that stan was a liability to town due to his inactivity.

The reason we dont have info is for the following two reasons, the cop and any other investigative role doesnt feel comfortable revealing information yet. Whom ever they investigated last night can either be damned or confirmed.

[Nemesis]

Let's take stock of what we have. Claims from Sin and Nem. Everyone except Scribble has posted in D2, so either Scribble is our cop, or our cop found nothing of importance, or doesn't trust his result. No counter claims on Flavour, or on Nem's physical protection. Beyond that, nothing solid, correct?

While having more input would be nice, Scribble's input is the one I'm waiting for. If he comes in with a Cop claim, or a physical protection claim, we can start doing something right quick.

Nem, before any surprises happen, you are Scum's Jailkeeper, and not Epic's Jailer, right? In other words JUST RB/Doc?

Why, want to have a chat?

Nem is playing the right way.

Sin claimed VT and is defending himself like a fucking retard.

Blackmage is explaining stuff.

Cyber has giant walls of Mexican text.

Mikey is being a little more reserved than usual yet still manages to ramble aimlessly on occasion.

phil is being a little bitch. So as usual. Since he's Mexican

Scribble is playing like usual, as in, if he had a stroke, no one would really notice since he is never here anyways.

Locust isn't doing much of anything and no one finds it strange at all because hey, why not grow the 23 club

Pass is being reserved.

kion is playing normally.

Old = Bawk Bawk BAWK!!!

So the only people I'm suspicious of right now is Old, Locust, Mikey, Pass, and maybe Nem.

That's better.

[Sin]

Why, want to have a chat?




That's better.

Hahahahahaha!

Fuckin faggot.

[Nemesis]

Hahahahahaha!

Fuckin faggot.

You are worse than Marian Hossa.

[Sin]

y u heff to be med?

- - - Updated - - -

On topic though: Last night was about as fruitful in the information department as yesterday was. I'd almost rather just lynch Nem to get the next day on the road. C'mon people. Aco with a VT soft claim is a little convenient, but I still don't like the way Blade smells.

Cyber brought up a good point on something OB said Day 1, he's not really suspicious to me, just new to the game.

Still pointing towards Nem though, he could simply be lying about his role and picked Aco at random, but we'll see. If he isn't Mafia will most likely take him out tonight to avoid getting blocked in the future.

Blade or Nem for me, now. It's a toss up.

[BladeTwinSwords]

I smell like Charleston Chews, you got somethin' against Charleston Chews?

[Passarelli]

i thought that one was first thing D2.

I still would argue your point, as it dosnt make alot of sense nor do you have a clear understanding of how this game works. Stan still had the ability to respond to the voting that was going on and either soft claim or hard claim to save himself from a vote. This makes your first scenario mute. Your second scenario dosnt make any sense. Lynching stan was just as random as lynching any one else, only that stan was a liability to town due to his inactivity.

Nope, that was right after you called me a 5th grader a couple hours before Stan got lynched. You may want to follow the advice you gave me earlier when you were berating me.

Lynching Stan wasn't random, as it was a 'policy lynch'. That in turn messed up the voting data which means that we are still working pretty blind.

I'm heading out--hopefully I can finish moving these bastards today. Never help a horder move, just burn their old house down with all their shit inside. Them too--you'll save yourself a lot of time.

Before I leave again:

Vote Locust


Locust, I would love to have a reason to trust you but all I have seen from you was saying that 'no lynch' is a bad idea on day 1 and you voting for Nem. Could you at least share you thoughts on others? The flavor text seems to implicate those who are taking a more passive role. I'll try to check in during the day in case you get back to us to unvote.