My lack of voting, day 1, I was trying to get a feel on people, and after the policy lynch started, I had nothing to share by voting for anyone, so voting seemed unnecessary. Day 2 is because I wanted to be convinced, or as close to it as we can get, before voting for someone. Like I said here policy lynching someone in our situation would be nigh useless. Only person I felt confident in lynching, the people I was close enough to trusting were NOT confident in voting. When I tried to get a conversation going on that topic, I was overshadowed by Cyber's message. In general, the people who would rather rush the game instead of looking things over have made my life difficult. I'm curious what sites these people play on that requires trying to end a game in 2 weeks.
If you're asking if I have a vote related role, I can say "no" to that. If you want me to vote to prove something, I'm willing. If you want me to vote to lynch, convince me. In the meantime I'll go after that lateral thinking.
Phil, why do you not trust Wolf? OB trusted Cyber, Cyber claimed Dean, no one has counter claimed. Brett said here that Dean was probably in the game. Do you think our real Dean is just hiding, that Dean isn't a good guy, or that Dean isn't in the game?
Originally Posted by ZERO
Register To Reply
