With that said, are we looking for a lynch vote?
I am utterly confused as what our game play is.
With that said, are we looking for a lynch vote?
I am utterly confused as what our game play is.
Pass, it all depends on what the mod decides. The right way to do it is one would always be designated as the killer, but we've already seen that things aren't being done the right way.
By allowing either of them to do it it would also make my role useless and again be shitty modding.
Nem, why blade, why not wolf?
furthermore, you are not a prime target for tonight, you arent even confirmed. The biggest target tonight would be the cop or role blocker. If the mafia leaves a roleblocker on the town side, unchecked.. they could lose an entire night of killing. Furthermore, i doubt the mafia wants to be investigated this coming night either. You are at the botom of the food chain so you shouldnt be worrying about kicking the bucket after night phase.
- - - Updated - - -
id also like to know.
Why not phil, why not aco, why not anyone else who has been acting scummy as shit all game?
If blade is telling the truth, it may behoove us to keep him around and use wolf lynch another day to take him out for a win. He negates numbers balancing against our favor for a mafia win.
Personal reform
Mikey, I am a confirmed double voter--my affiliation isn't confirmed however. You say I'm bad at this game, but if you didn't get that my role is confirmed--well, I think that speaks for itself. That is why I am a major target for mafia if and only if Wolf is lynched today and misses his shot as it would end the game and mafia would win.
I laid out a logical argument on day 1 as to why people shouldn't vote for Stan. What I had said was nearly prophetic.
I laid out a logical argument day 3 as to why people should vote for Phil or another un-investigated VT. People ignored it, and now we are where I said we would be yet again.
I laid out a 3rd logical argument today and it was entirely ignored again--except for you to call me out as being a pompous asshole. While I may indeed be a pompous asshole, at least I don't try to substitute rhetoric for logic. If the logic isn't flawed, that means it is true. I did not see any fallacies, and I specifically asked people to point them out.
I did not share an opinion. I shared a logical deductive argument. It would behoove you to look it up the difference. Had I used subjective logic you might have had a point. You should really try to learn how to use logic to find answers rather then basing your answers on emotion. That is how politicians play people.
Phil, look at my argument as to why we should not lynch Wolf today.
If Wolf is targeted tonight, then Kionay will have another investigation he can share tomorrow.
What: my life skills use meat
“Let us be thankful for the fools. But for them the rest of us could not succeed. ” -Mark Twain
What: my life skills use meat
“Let us be thankful for the fools. But for them the rest of us could not succeed. ” -Mark Twain
for the record. there was an occurence before where stan edited a post and i couldnt see the "edited" status, even with mod powers, and there was no original post other than the one posted.
With stan's shit quoted before, it IS possible that pass edited a post within like 5 minutes, and it would be impossible to prove right now without Zero.
but zero has been informed of this, and i ask ppl to please watch the damn edit button and care what they are doing...
if mikey has an older email with a different quote, it's possible, i cannot confirm or deny this being what happened now, but like i said , AS FAR AS I KNow, it wasnt edited.
this is a rare occurence and could be a forum bug that has been reported.
so its rly ur call now.
That's odd Cyber. Thanks for the heads up.
I'm 99% sure I didn't, but I will be extra careful in the future. I definitely wouldn't have done it on purpose for that post, and if I had, I would have fixed that horrible quote.
What: my life skills use meat
“Let us be thankful for the fools. But for them the rest of us could not succeed. ” -Mark Twain
here to confirm that if you do edit within the first 2.5 minutes it does not show the post as edited to anyone.