Quote Originally Posted by CYBER View Post
I dont get what you're getting at.
Also , there IS a possibility that you voted in the following pages AFTER the quote I took from you. Because I was compiling a full comment from quotes while reading page by page... so it's possibly you thought i was referring to this after you voted, but i was targetting that post at the time you didn't. If that's the case, my bad for not paying attention, but i did not accuse you anywhere other than asked you for "help" or advice on who YOU thought was a proper target.
This must be the case because you didn't quote me on anything and simply listed 2 pages and said--let me paraphrase here-- "what you are saying is fine and dandy but you left the hard choices for others". I had already voted when you posted this--as soon as I got home and saw that there was a vote for Stan. The first vote or for Stan to stop being AFK is what I was waiting for--The fact that there was already a vote for Nemesis was just icing on the cake. I had already seen that Nemesis was acting scummy and would have very likely voted for him anyway as there are no other viable options that I see at this point--you are quite wrong about my motives for voting for him.

Quote Originally Posted by CYBER View Post
@passerelli
in pages 8 and 9:
I understand that you are definitely trying to tell people that "no lynching" on day 1 is bad, and there needs to be a lynch today. That's fine and all, you are right (imo) about the key points you posted, but you're leaving the hard part out for other ppl instead of yourself:
WHO. WHO do you want to lynch on day 1? see thats the hard question. people tend to the no lynch BECAUSE they can't point a finger at someone. and honestly, from experience, the only way we were able to isolate scummy behaviours is by waiting for bandwagons on a very random or stupid person and see how it plays out...And currently? that's either Stan for being irish 2.0, or nemesis... for, AGAIN, always pressing ppl buttons for claiming, yet dodges everything thrown at him.
How you posted was pretty confusing, as the discussion had clearly moved on from that point. You asked a question that was already pretty clearly answered. You also asked it in what I took as an aggressive, accusatory manner (caps and repetition), then going on saying it is a hard choice when I had already voted. I guess I just really had no idea how to respond to your post because I had already answered the question, and thus took it as you basically leaving me a Hobson's Choice to react to your comment, which I read as you seeing me avoiding hard questions.

This seemed pretty hypocritical, as I had already voted and you were just getting around to fingering someone.

Sorry everyone for the misunderstanding.

- - - Updated - - -

Nemesis, why did you decide to vote for Stan instead of someone that you see as scummy?