Supernatural Mafia

[phil.™]

Nem, why blade, why not wolf?

[DJ_MikeyRevile]

furthermore, you are not a prime target for tonight, you arent even confirmed. The biggest target tonight would be the cop or role blocker. If the mafia leaves a roleblocker on the town side, unchecked.. they could lose an entire night of killing. Furthermore, i doubt the mafia wants to be investigated this coming night either. You are at the botom of the food chain so you shouldnt be worrying about kicking the bucket after night phase.

- - - Updated - - -

Nem, why blade, why not wolf?

id also like to know.

Why not phil, why not aco, why not anyone else who has been acting scummy as shit all game?

If blade is telling the truth, it may behoove us to keep him around and use wolf lynch another day to take him out for a win. He negates numbers balancing against our favor for a mafia win.

[Nemesis]

If wolf is killed at night he has no power yes? Will he last another day?

[DJ_MikeyRevile]

If wolf is killed at night he has no power yes? Will he last another day?

That depends. Ask yourself, if you were mafia and the win was just in reach, would you risk a role like wolfs being alive the next day to policy lynch a win?

- - - Updated - - -

to my understanding, in regards to your first question, no, his ability dosnt work if he is killed at night.

[Passarelli]

Mikey, I am a confirmed double voter--my affiliation isn't confirmed however. You say I'm bad at this game, but if you didn't get that my role is confirmed--well, I think that speaks for itself. That is why I am a major target for mafia if and only if Wolf is lynched today and misses his shot as it would end the game and mafia would win.

I laid out a logical argument on day 1 as to why people shouldn't vote for Stan. What I had said was nearly prophetic.
I laid out a logical argument day 3 as to why people should vote for Phil or another un-investigated VT. People ignored it, and now we are where I said we would be yet again.
I laid out a 3rd logical argument today and it was entirely ignored again--except for you to call me out as being a pompous asshole. While I may indeed be a pompous asshole, at least I don't try to substitute rhetoric for logic. If the logic isn't flawed, that means it is true. I did not see any fallacies, and I specifically asked people to point them out.

I did not share an opinion. I shared a logical deductive argument. It would behoove you to look it up the difference. Had I used subjective logic you might have had a point. You should really try to learn how to use logic to find answers rather then basing your answers on emotion. That is how politicians play people.

Phil, look at my argument as to why we should not lynch Wolf today.

If Wolf is targeted tonight, then Kionay will have another investigation he can share tomorrow.

[DJ_MikeyRevile]

personally, i suspect either yourself or kionay going this coming night. I dont think wolf will get touched.

[Passarelli]

Pass, it all depends on what the mod decides. The right way to do it is one would always be designated as the killer, but we've already seen that things aren't being done the right way.

By allowing either of them to do it it would also make my role useless and again be shitty modding.

Nem, the person who makes the kill is likely decided by mafia each night. If you were to block them, it would stop the kill. That is how I would mod it personally. Your role isn't useless anyway, as it makes a good protective role. This setup was not designed to have 100% protection on the cop (had a deputy, faith healer, and bodyguard). You could protect Wolf so he doesn't die at night, me if a double vote would give us an extra day, or even Kionay to try to stop the kill.

- - - Updated - - -

personally, i suspect either yourself or kionay going this coming night. I dont think wolf will get touched.

I'm guessing you mean Nem getting targeted?

[DJ_MikeyRevile]

Mikey, I am a confirmed double voter--my affiliation isn't confirmed however. You say I'm bad at this game, but if you didn't get that my role is confirmed--well, I think that speaks for itself. That is why I am a major target for mafia if and only if Wolf is lynched today and misses his shot as it would end the game and mafia would win.

I laid out a logical argument on day 1 as to why people shouldn't vote for Stan. What I had said was nearly prophetic.
I laid out a logical argument day 3 as to why people should vote for Phil or another un-investigated VT. People ignored it, and now we are where I said we would be yet again.
I laid out a 3rd logical argument today and it was entirely ignored again--except for you to call me out as being a pompous asshole. While I may indeed be a pompous asshole, at least I don't try to substitute rhetoric for logic. If the logic isn't flawed, that means it is true. I did not see any fallacies, and I specifically asked people to point them out.

I did not share an opinion. I shared a logical deductive argument. It would behoove you to look it up the difference. Had I used subjective logic you might have had a point. You should really try to learn how to use logic to find answers rather then basing your answers on emotion. That is how politicians play people.

Phil, look at my argument as to why we should not lynch Wolf today.

If Wolf is targeted tonight, then Kionay will have another investigation he can share tomorrow.

no, no you are not confirmed. Becuase your alignment is NOT CONFIRMED! Even then, you being a DV is questionable because multiple people, including sin, voted on the same days you did (that are not dead AKA wolf) that means, wolf could be lying and you could be lying. At the end of the day, you are not 100% confirmed. Bottom line. Even if you were, your "opinion" dosnt carry any more fucking weight then an opinion from some one who isnt confirmed.

Im sorry if you are taking this personally and reflecting back into this game. My point is, you are a 10 year old child who dosnt understand that people will not always agree with what you say. It is a fact of life and am positive that once your 3rd grade teacher starts teaching new words, beyond the word "logic" it will take less time to respond to my posts! Hooray!


"logical" or not, i am asking you as a fucking person, to stop acting like your opinion trumps whatever anyone else has to say.

Furthermore, if you had the ability to read, which im sure you do... you would know and aknowledge that im not entierly for a wolf lynch today. But hey.. you dont read the thread it seems.

- - - Updated - - -

Nem, the person who makes the kill is likely decided by mafia each night. If you were to block them, it would stop the kill. That is how I would mod it personally. Your role isn't useless anyway, as it makes a good protective role. This setup was not designed to have 100% protection on the cop (had a deputy, faith healer, and bodyguard). You could protect Wolf so he doesn't die at night, me if a double vote would give us an extra day, or even Kionay to try to stop the kill.

- - - Updated - - -



I'm guessing you mean Nem getting targeted?

yourself = nem

[Passarelli]

Mikey, you fail at this game. Look at the voting record. It was between myself and Sin. We are the only people who voted day 2 that did not vote day 1. Sin has since been confirmed VT, so that leaves me. Hence my role is 100% confirmed. I already said my affiliation is not confirmed. I guess you didn't read that.

Again, what I said was not an opinion. You must not read my posts before raging.

If the last time you learned about logic was in 3rd grade (by the way, most people in 3rd grade are 9. Were you held back a year?) you should really look into it again.

I really do not even see where I said that any opinion (keep in mind, my logical argument is NOT an opinion) I had was better then anyone else's. Sure, I may have argued for it, or even belittled the other person--hey, that is what you have been doing to me--but that is what people naturally do to further their opinions.

Finally Mikey, how does where you stand on the Wolf Lynch issue have anything to do with what we are talking about? You jumped up my asshole like a faggot in heat for saying, "However, as I already showed, lynching Wolf at this point would be a bad move, and we should save that option for tomorrow." That was an entirely acceptable thing to say as no one had even voiced descent, let alone point out a fallacy in my argument. Please, tell me who's opinion I was belittling? Oh, noone's? You've just been spewing shit out of your mouth this whole time? Oh, okay, cool.

[DJ_MikeyRevile]

Mikey, you fail at this game. Look at the voting record. It was between myself and Sin. We are the only people who voted day 2 that did not vote day 1. Sin has since been confirmed VT, so that leaves me. Hence my role is 100% confirmed. I already said my affiliation is not confirmed. I guess you didn't read that.

Again, what I said was not an opinion. You must not read my posts before raging.

If the last time you learned about logic was in 3rd grade (by the way, most people in 3rd grade are 9. Were you held back a year?) you should really look into it again.

I really do not even see where I said that any opinion (keep in mind, my logical argument is NOT an opinion) I had was better then anyone else's. Sure, I may have argued for it, or even belittled the other person--hey, that is what you have been doing to me--but that is what people naturally do to further their opinions.

Finally Mikey, how does where you stand on the Wolf Lynch issue have anything to do with what we are talking about? You jumped up my asshole like a faggot in heat for saying, "However, as I already showed, lynching Wolf at this point would be a bad move, and we should save that option for tomorrow." That was an entirely acceptable thing to say as no one had even voiced descent, let alone point out a fallacy in my argument. Please, tell me who's opinion I was belittling? Oh, noone's? You've just been spewing shit out of your mouth this whole time? Oh, okay, cool.

No, that sentence implies that no matter what, you are right and anyone who dosnt agree is a fucking scum bag. It is what adults call a loaded sentence.

- - - Updated - - -

i fail at this game? Says the guy who is playing for his first time. All i want you to understand is that, what you say is opinion and not everyone is going to agree with you. Unless you have evidence to support a statement, it is opinion "logical" or not.