Quote Originally Posted by Passarelli View Post
At least 1 of the mafia has likely voted in the 4 person wagons. Otherwise, scum likely would have hammered it.

Right now the person I suspect the most is Fallen. He has said very little other then voting. He has been on both lynch wagons of 4 people and gets off the wagon gets off track.

Phil was the first unvote when there were 4 people on the wagon for Hosh, which makes me think that he isn't scum.

Trig, to answer your question: Yes, I do agree with you. Lynching someone for inactivity is always a bad idea. The first reason is that there are traditionally roles that want to sit back and watch and stay out of the crosshairs so they aren't forced to claim (Cop and Doctor both usually do this on day 1). The second reason is that it comes dangerously close to a policy lynch which again, is a horrible idea.
I actually just re-read everything and agree with Pass. If you look back at everyones posts (which i just did) Fallen has done nothing except vote randomly, unvote, or say that he is waiting to see what everyone else does. That isn't overtly scummy, but he seems to be posting just enough to seem active.

My first inclination on certain people:

Pass : seems to be active and forthcoming with information. Not afraid to vote for a no lynch even though we have seen in the past that that can be detrimental to town. Made a good case for no lynch.

Phil : Seems to be equally active as pass. 4th vote to lynch someone and 3rd bandwagon jump. Suspicious but not overtly so.

Minjae : Hasn't posted anything concrete. Mostly posting for the sake of posting. Scummy ?

Assassin : I voted Assassin because one of his posts hit me as strange. Re-reading i might remove this.

Fallen: Calls people inactive but hasnt been active himself. Only posts have been lynch/nolynch or commenting about how he will vote based on how everyone else does. Isn't making decisions for himself but following group. Slightly suspicious.