Well I actually thought my vote was the last one needed, so that's kind of self-explanatory - nothing personal Phil, I just suspect you.
As far as Blade and me working together I really can't see where you see this. Blade's been inactive up until about page 13. I guess you could say that's strategy, but ... meh ... if you listen to everyone else I've apparently been following a 'vote train' - which I don't really see either, but I guess you guys do.
- - - Updated - - -
As Phil says, I'll gladly volunteer as tribute, but just know that you've got the wrong guy.
- - - Updated - - -
also, lolololololololol69posts @swagswagswagyolo
- - - Updated - - -
#* ...
- - - Updated - - -
I will say, Scribble, that after your contributions I'd have to move you from unsure to townie.
It was decent in that he didn't try overly hard, offered to sacrifice himself, and finally he didn't slip up. I didn't mean decent as good, simply okay.
He seems to be playing as a VT. I haven't played with you vets in a closed setup, so it is hard to tell since he can't try gambits like he did last game. That said, I doubt he is a power role. He could be scum, but I'd say I'm 85% confident he is a VT.
It wasn't really a change of heart. It is more that a wagon finally got high enough to force out a claim and the claim we got wasn't a power role. Scum is going to claim VT in this game because it is a closed set and they don't have enough people to sacrifice to eliminate any of the power roles. I don't mind the 50+ pages of discussion, but fishing and forcing out more people to claim will keep increasing the chances that scum will kill the power roles.
What: my life skills use meat
“Let us be thankful for the fools. But for them the rest of us could not succeed. ” -Mark Twain
I am going to do a count of who has alluded to being a VT.
So where do you stand as a whole Pass?
Call it scummy if you want, but I'd kind of like to know where everyone stands. Mikey and Scribble have convinced themselves that I'm working with Blade- what do the rest of you think?
- - - Updated - - -
Personally I'm still on the Phil bandwagon. Sorry Phil.
- - - Updated - - -
Well, wouldn't we all have, considering that's the only role to play it safe as?
UNVOTE
I agree with the mindset of the possibility of Blade coaching Zambi, but I'm a little worried about your logic on then lynching Zambi instead of Blade, considering Blade's playstyle this game and further admittance of him playing scummy (See Below).
This doesn't help town at all, and as I don't like the way you're approaching this game, as well as the fact you deflected my questions earlier with more filler, I'm switching my vote.
(See my inquiry above)
- Piggybacking someone else's defense (an already generic defense).
- For someone who only pages ago went back through the thread and did votecount per request, it's weird that you wouldn't do the same before possibly hammering someone? Itchy trigger finger?
- The only thing scribble really added to the discussion were his detailed views on Cyber (which I agree with), so not sure WHY his "contributions" gave you a townread on him.
Oh and...
VOTE BLADE
4) Use admin privileges sparingly and appropriately.
But really, no such thing has happened. With Blade or anyone else.
What? Volunteering as 'tribute'?
Athlete's Finger. SO itchy. Honestly I just want to see the outcome for today, even if it is me who ends up getting lynched.
I don't actually know really. I guess just the nature of his post. It seemed genuine - I don't think he's trying to hide anything.
I think I'll stick with Phil this time.
Sigh, we have 2 people claiming vt. Both of which I'm still suspicious of. Nambi is all over the place with his voting. If we were going the safe route of lynching one of then I would vote Nambi. Phil will be more useful to town in terms of analysis.
- - - Updated - - -
I do however think we should wait and talk it out more. I also need to take time a read this over again
4) Use admin privileges sparingly and appropriately.