Mafia Game: Monster Mash (Hosted by Sin and What)

[SCRIBBLE]

Yes he could be lying but I was telling him this in hopes the other VTs would not follow suit.

[DJ_MikeyRevile]

As for the rest of you, dont buy into this baseless attack. When I get home from work, ill do a post break down and explain my thoughts regarding this ridiculous attack.

For now ill say... mafia cant nk, the only way for them to win is lynch werewolfs and lead lynches.

[SCRIBBLE]

For now ill say... mafia cant nk, the only way for them to win is lynch werewolfs and lead lynches.

Yes they most certainly can nk. Go read the role description in the sign up thread.

- - - Updated - - -

Belay my last, I have it backwards.

[Blackmage]

You were trying to reply to my post by quoting someone else, using their entire quote instead of just the relevant portions, not changing who is was by or talking to. A quote, that was talking to you, and you hadn't responded to. Also, it claims that there was nothing to respond to, and yet Cyber had posted and you have yet to respond. This means in order for that to have been your reply, you would have had to be lying, yet again! How ever could I have missed this?

Oh, and your post: "I answered your question with passes quote you fucking moron." has a double meaning. You should have said: "I answered your question by using pass's quote." or "Passes quote was my response" or any one of the other options. What you said can also be read "I answered your question while answering Pass's quote". Which, let's examine, you posted his quote, a response, and then something that was obviously to me. A quote, a response, and another response.

Could someone translate this for me? "Yes what I saying is, if I sit here and reiterate that someone is vt, it is because I do not fos them, I am confident in that persons claim." I think I understand that he's saying that if he keeps saying someone is something, he truly believes that claim. What is talking about with the fos part?

My main arguments have nothing to do with my opinions. Either A: you made an error or B: you are committing the false-causality fallacy. This is not opinion, this is how language works. A proper version of that post would have been: If I(Mikey) admit to being ok with lynching a vt, that means I(Mikey) trusts the lynchee is a vt. You said "someone" which means you are telling us what an unidentified person believes. You give an action that someone specifically other than yourself does, and then proceed to explain what that means. You have left no wiggle room, used no conditionals. The sentence you used is an opinion portrayed as a fact.

To clarify, I didn't mean to ignore your posts. I just accidentally attributed you with a little too much intelligence. Don't worry, I won't make that same mistake again this game. It has been mentioned to me that a lie requires knowing what you say is untrue. If the case is you just don't know what you are saying, I'm sorry for saying that you're lying.

Oh, and ending your post saying what I said in the first actual post of the game. Thanks for the nod.

Scribble: That's why I said to think of them as scum 3rd party. The naming scheme on this game may be confusing to those who don't play variants often.

[DJ_MikeyRevile]

You were trying to reply to my post by quoting someone else, using their entire quote instead of just the relevant portions, not changing who is was by or talking to. A quote, that was talking to you, and you hadn't responded to. Also, it claims that there was nothing to respond to, and yet Cyber had posted and you have yet to respond. This means in order for that to have been your reply, you would have had to be lying, yet again! How ever could I have missed this?

Oh, and your post: "I answered your question with passes quote you fucking moron." has a double meaning. You should have said: "I answered your question by using pass's quote." or "Passes quote was my response" or any one of the other options. What you said can also be read "I answered your question while answering Pass's quote". Which, let's examine, you posted his quote, a response, and then something that was obviously to me. A quote, a response, and another response.

Could someone translate this for me? "Yes what I saying is, if I sit here and reiterate that someone is vt, it is because I do not fos them, I am confident in that persons claim." I think I understand that he's saying that if he keeps saying someone is something, he truly believes that claim. What is talking about with the fos part?

My main arguments have nothing to do with my opinions. Either A: you made an error or B: you are committing the false-causality fallacy. This is not opinion, this is how language works. A proper version of that post would have been: If I(Mikey) admit to being ok with lynching a vt, that means I(Mikey) trusts the lynchee is a vt. You said "someone" which means you are telling us what an unidentified person believes. You give an action that someone specifically other than yourself does, and then proceed to explain what that means. You have left no wiggle room, used no conditionals. The sentence you used is an opinion portrayed as a fact.

To clarify, I didn't mean to ignore your posts. I just accidentally attributed you with a little too much intelligence. Don't worry, I won't make that same mistake again this game. It has been mentioned to me that a lie requires knowing what you say is untrue. If the case is you just don't know what you are saying, I'm sorry for saying that you're lying.

Oh, and ending your post saying what I said in the first actual post of the game. Thanks for the nod.

Scribble: That's why I said to think of them as scum 3rd party. The naming scheme on this game may be confusing to those who don't play variants often.

you are deranged sir. Simply deranged.

This is you ----> "You posted at approximately 1:43 and 23 seconds in the PM, then they posted exactly 3 min later on the 23rd second. You did not reply for another hour! so you are a liar! HA!"

I am not re typing every single post i have made because you fail to understand them. Almost home

- - - Updated - - -

it was rhetoric....

[minjae]

In a sense, we are all deranged.

Completely and utterly deranged.

[Trigger Unhappy]

No one has called Phil smelly yet. Don't understand Blackmages push on Mikey. Seemed innocent enough at the time.

[Blackmage]

you are deranged sir. Simply deranged.

This is you ----> "You posted at approximately 1:43 and 23 seconds in the PM, then they posted exactly 3 min later on the 23rd second. You did not reply for another hour! so you are a liar! HA!"

I am not re typing every single post i have made because you fail to understand them. Almost home

- - - Updated - - -

it was rhetoric....

Nothing about my derangement is simple. I take offense to that sir.

Also, it wouldn't be approximate. If I couldn't find the seconds, I wouldn't add them, but I'd be exact. Second, I'd only call you a liar if you said you'd respond within, say, 50 minutes of them posting. If you correct those two problems, you be exactly correct!

[DJ_MikeyRevile]

I will get started.

Actually, saying you're ok with lynching a VT means that you understand that in this setup, during D1 at least 3 out of the 4 scum will claim VT. However, if it ISN'T one of the scum, you're not hitting, or outting, a PR in the process. I'm ok with hitting a VT too. Doesn't mean that's what I'm aiming for.

This post completely neglected me saying " Why not continue to scum hunt knowing your pool of suspects is even smaller." The conversation revolved around lynching a known vt or at least one that claimed to be vt. Therefor, your reason for lynching the person who claimed vt is based solely off the fact that you think one of two things.. 1. They are vt or 2. they are maf. Given the latter, my statement revolved around letting people know that, despite knowing who we will lynch, we shouldn't prematurely lynch. Prematuraly as in.. rush it and quick lynch.

Again, you ignored that part of my post you replied to. Thus, i came to a general and quick conclusion that you were subtly suggesting more people vote for minj. You know the guy who had not even claimed VT to begin with.


Here is your question you claimed i never responded too

I'm now just curious what made you bring that up?

First response

There you go. Next time do it yourself you lazy fig.

In this post was passes quote voting minjae and saying he wouldn't mind lynching a vt.
Second response

Perhaps this is a literacy thing... I answered your question with passes quote you fucking moron. Aside from that, I dont aee you asking anything elae and here yoy are accusing me of lying.

My third time now. Pass voted minjae while simultaneously stating that he wouldnt mind lynching a VT. The vote combined with that statement suggests that he assumes minjae is VT. If that is the case, i suggested it would be wise not to try and end the day fast. To wait a bit longer.



Now, as for the "my lying" portion. You are still incorrect and it is very clear given your reluctant behavior to stop this berating.. that you are blind sided and skipping posts. That statement of mine is not a lie, it is an opinion, the way i view a persons behaviour. Did i use the word trust loosely? Perhaps but it does not negate the fact that it is an opinion and therefore can not be a lie. Secondly, this "lie" is your only talking point and the base of all your attacks on me. When in reality, even if it was questionable, it is miniscule and HARDLY worth noting at all. Its in relation to theory and how one person reads a player vs another.

So i conclude this blackmage, given your behavior.

You are not a town power role nor a town team. You would not be so vocal and childish if you were.
I also personally conclude that you are not a werewolf, for the reason just stated.

That leaves VT and mafia. I do not think you are VT and here is why.
You were the first person to post. Your post was a very obvious post about what to do and not to do. By coming out the gate with "helpful advice" you attempted to win hearts and mines.
Why would you do that? Because as mafia, who can not night kill.. your only way to win is lead lynches on townies and werewolves. Your chance at winning is greatly reduced if you are not in charge or being listened to by a majority of town.
What you are doing right now is bashing me with senseless reasons.

If you are a VT then you are playing really bad and i suggest you let it go.

- - - Updated - - -

This is not opinion, this is how language works. The sentence you used is an opinion

Your best post!

- - - Updated - - -

had i said you contradicted yourself without cutting out the specific part and quoted it, im afraid you may not have understood. It is what you are asking of me, correct? to quote just the specific parts of posts?

- - - Updated - - -

You were trying to reply to my post by quoting someone else, using their entire quote instead of just the relevant portions.

alas, you did.

- - - Updated - - -

Im done with this ridiculous argument.

[Blackmage]

First,



Second, writing a response because this is fun! But before that, can you tell me, did you really mean that nothing worth responding to had been said? Related, excusing your posts and mine, has anything been said of use? My reply will probably be an hour or so away, but if you so choose not to reply to this, alas, I'll have less to write.