Mafia Game: Donner Party 2: Don Harder

[What]

Its like your the Donald Trump of Mafia, just deny, deny, deny like it never happened and I can't be the only one seeing this.

There fundamentally is a disconnect here, especiially when you keep denying having said things that you have. Maybe not in the exact same words, but the same thing none the less.

Who gets to make the decision in your plan? You alone? Do you have to agree with the decision to make it the decision? You are acting like you are the mayor of the town and get to be the "decider" of how things go, which is laughable. You are flailing like a mad man trying to cling to semantics. People had decided, Cyber was going to be lynched, even if it was out of boredom or poorly thought out. You "decided" to not follow your own plan because you got spooked and look at all the vacillating you have had to do to pretend that wasn't the case.

You decided to not follow your own plan = fact. You can play with words all you like, but reality doesn't lie.

I mean pretty much you have screwed yourself for no reason, which I can take great delight in. Please now argue with me about the definition of "is" and how "reality" is just subjective. Thats not suspicious at all.

[Blackmage]

5 people had decided. Which is not even half. Dunno if you can do math.

[CYBER]

my oh my ... so many words.
I must be a lucky charm to always start up conversations with wagons on me -.-

[What]

6 = lynch.... are you like being deliberately obtuse.

"We can't back down, we have to follow through......but only if I agree, yeah, thats what it was all along....."

I'm having a great time, keep digging that hole.

- - - Updated - - -

my oh my ... so many words.
I must be a lucky charm to always start up conversations with wagons on me -.-

Well, BM shit his pants by mistake and now wants to write the next great american novel to explain why that smell was already there.

[Blackmage]

Ok what. Let's make this simple. Rather than waving your hands around trying to prove something is there, why not do the logical thing and quote it?

[Blackmage]

I've played with bad mods like you before, so why would I rule out a possibility?

[Blackmage]

My plan was "once we decide on a person, we should pull the trigger". Not "once someone gets votes we should off him". Here's a fun fact: I didn't vote for you either.

Your problem seems to be that you think YOU deciding is the whole town. I am part of the town. I did not agree. In fact, the majority did not agree. Ergo, town did NOT decide. The town did not choose. It was a minority calling for the day to end. There was no consensus. This really isn't that hard, you just really wanted Cyber dead and now are trying for your second target. No semantics, just facts.

Also, the TOWN needs to decide. The reason I haven't taken my vote off of you, is because you're not town. However, there was no discussion on Cyber until you posted something. There was no "town deciding who to vote for" in any case. There was just "town deciding to end the day". One gives useful vote information. One gives a lot of "oops, but I didn't really care" if it's wrong, which, while scumtell, I doubt that all of them are scum.

Put simply, if town had decided, Cyber would be dead.

Also, you explaining what I said is, once again, putting words in someone else's mouth. You really are a lovely hypocrite, and not ashamed of it. Of the last 3 things of mine you've quoted, you've tried telling me what I said after I explained what I said twice.

[StarsMine]

My plan was "once we decide on a person, we should pull the trigger". Not "once someone gets votes we should off him". Here's a fun fact: I didn't vote for you either.

Im confused, is 6 votes on a person, not town deciding to pull the trigger on someone? There is no logical difference in the two scenarios you posted.

Town essentially did decide until you backed out. Its Majority vote, not Unanamous.

[What]

Im confused, is 6 votes on a person, not town deciding to pull the trigger on someone? There is no logical difference in the two scenarios you posted.

Town essentially did decide until you backed out. Its Majority vote, not Unanamous.

This BM so much this. This is what I have been saying. The sixth vote is the clinching vote, you are acting like you wouldn't make a decision until after the person had been lynched and at that point who cares? I mean how would a "decision" even be made in your plan? A general agreement to lynch someone looks a hell of a lot like a decision to me.

Look BM is a person with no votes on him, all I said was for people to keep an eye on him due to what he said this game and how past games have gone and he has lost his mind trying to defend himself.

[SCRIBBLE]

See, a train on cyber always reveals information. Though I'm not particularly excited
to read a two page argument between two people who could very well be teammates.