Mafia Game: Donner Party 2: Don Harder

[What]

You saying that you aren't following a decision until someone gets at least 6 votes is what is laughable since at that point they are already lynched, there is no decision to follow. I don't understand how a person could not possible see that.

[Assassin]

Why can't the threshold be after? ELI5.

- - - Updated - - -

Related: Who decides what the threshold is.

Your mother, sorry had to.

[What]

I don't know, you tell me. You say a decision does not need a consensus of any sort, so I'm can't be certain what you believe.

Of course there needs to be a consensus, you realize what voting is and how that works in these games right? Please lets argue over definitions more that's riveting stuff.

- - - Updated - - -

My objections to you are becoming clearer and clearer with these posts, mostly because they are not buried in an essay. How can you not see how your refusal to accept a decision until at least 6 votes are on someone makes literally no sense at all.

[Trigger Unhappy]

While these two continue this discussion does anyone else want to start a train? at this point we could all do a 1-11 dice roll and see who gets the most votes since we would get as much value out of that as this argument over the word "decision".

[Assassin]

I think we are all on the cyber yolo train still because it's tradition! Zambi is a brain eater though, so if we want to start a new train, I'd be ok with that.

[Blackmage]

What, here's a problem you have, you think I said I'd vote for a partial consensus. I said we need to decide. I voted AGAINST that, which is my prerogative. Ergo, we did NOT decide, because there was NOT a consensus. Which part is too hard to understand?

Ass: I asked her, she looked at me confused. You're not helpful

Trig: Not trying to get useful information. Just trying to make sure What looks like a fool when I come out town-sided If more people wanted to participate, we could get this day done.

[What]

What, here's a problem you have, you think I said I'd vote for a partial consensus. I said we need to decide. I voted AGAINST that, which is my prerogative. Ergo, we did NOT decide, because there was NOT a consensus. Which part is too hard to understand?

But that means you did not follow your own plan! Jesus Mother Trucking Chriz-ist. Just admit you didn't follow your own plan, could arguing over semantics since no one can possible think that is a good argument. "We need to decide" What in the fuck does that mean for you? It can't possibly mean once someone gets 6 votes since then they are already lynched at that point, which would mean your entire plan was a ploy to ensure you didn't have to vote for anyone. You didn't answer my point, you can't answer my point on the threshold since it proves nearly everything I have been saying about you. Good lord it can't be any clearer than that.

- - - Updated - - -

You said we had to commit, just stubbornly train someone. I said that was stupid, you said it wasn't but then didn't do it. That is what happened, can we all just agree on what reality is for god sake?

[Blackmage]

You do not understand my plan. You are trying to put words in my mouth rather than admit that you're wrong. I will admit all of that.

[What]

You do not understand my plan. You are trying to put words in my mouth rather than admit that you're wrong. I will admit all of that.

Please explain your plan, quit telling me I don't understand it and explain its mechanics. What is the threshold for you? Answer these things without resorting to parsing apart definitions and it may make sense, but so far, you have been laughably burying yourself with your own words.

[Blackmage]

When we choose someone, there is no claim that we can let live. You know, what I said in the first two sentences of the first post in response to you here.