Thanks. I try. However, that's not what I said. I just said skip the "give them a chance to defend themselves" phase for day 1.
You'd like to think that, wouldn't you? You've beaten my giant, which means you're exceptionally strong, so you could've put the poison in your own goblet, trusting on your strength to save you, so I can clearly not choose the wine in front of you. But, you've also bested my Spaniard, which means you must have studied, and in studying you must have learned that man is mortal, so you would have put the poison as far from yourself as possible, so I can clearly not choose the wine in front of me.Originally Posted by What
Good thing I didn't then.Originally Posted by what
That's relevant how? When did I say anything about "unflinching railing".Originally Posted by What
Yes, that's my point.Originally Posted by what
This is you. This is my mouth. These are words. These are the words being shoved in my mouth by you. I never said that.Originally Posted by what
Let's look at what I said.Originally Posted by what
"Once we choose someone, we pretty much have to lynch them D1." You seem to have only read the part after the comma. However, I started by saying "once we choose someone", not once someone has votes. I know this is confusing, but bear with me. My point was, once we chose someone, there is no claim that can let them live.Originally Posted by Blackmage
"With no protection, and pretty much every NK being janitored, a good bluff would screw us." This is what I went into in more detail above. There is no claim that is safe to let live.
"However, step one is deciding who to go for." Oh look, I said DECIDE. Not "I'm going to vote for whomever gets the most votes."
"We'll probably hit town day one, but the vote will be at least half town no matter what." This is me saying there are risks, but town needs to decide. People deciding on their own rather than playing follow the leader means town had some REASON to vote for someone. Playing follow the leader only works if the leader is trustworthy. Which is why I didn't vote for Cyber. The only people who gave any reasons were Scribble, whose only contribution towards the game has been pushing Cyber, and you, who was pushing me while putting words in my mouth. The one mafia I brought up? It is a possibility. There were 3 factions, so removing a player from a faction ends with... get this... 3 different results, one of which is a single mafiaso. However, I brought the one mafiaso up in parenthesis, saying only if the mod is doing something rude. I'm also the one who brought up daytalk, which means I don't think it's one mafia. Basically, your reasons for suspecting me is something you decided I said, and something that I brought up to be thorough. Oh, and calling you on your Freudian slip. Which, you were oddly defensive about, come to think of it...
"The town has a few weapons, we need to use them." This is me pushing for the Vig to shoot and for us to not NL in case anyone brought that option up.
The MESSAGE. As in "you put words in my mouth". Not the exact words. I know, I know, English is hard.Originally Posted by what