Remove Some Maps

[Wallet]

Ug had to redo this whole damn thread......

Server: GunGame MOD+

Remove:
Map #1: aim_ag_texture_city_summer_v1
Map #2: gg_dust_city_advanced
Map #3: gg_ancient_city_advanced
Map #4: gg_scoutzknivez2_css <-- Not even a GunGame Map. R.I.P... And gets rtv'ed almost everytime we play.
Map #5: aim_ag_texture_city_advanced

Add:
Map #1: gg_105th | Link: http://css.gamebanana.com/maps/183857
Map #2: GG_DF_LEGO_ZIGZAG | Link: http://css.gamebanana.com/maps/182856
Map #3: GG_DF_LEGO_KLEINEVILLA | Link: http://css.gamebanana.com/maps/182569
Map #4: GG_CORNER_EX | Link: http://css.gamebanana.com/maps/176869
Map #5: GG_SHOTTY_SNOW | Link: http://css.gamebanana.com/maps/14925

Reasoning:
I personally think that it is time to change some of these maps, given that we have been playing them everyday for the last god knows how long. Time to switch it up a bit. Taking out 5, and then adding 5 will do the trick. I chose some maps that i remember (2 of them are new to me) from way back when. I hope that you guys really consider this cause tbh server starting to get old with the same maps. XD.

[Joker]

no, none of those maps should be removed, we play all of those maps all the time. They're good maps and it helps with server population.

as for the adding maps I would say
Map #5: GG_SHOTTY_SNOW | Link: http://css.gamebanana.com/maps/14925 this one is an old but a good one

These look ok and wouldn't mind playing a few times through
Map #1: gg_105th | Link: http://css.gamebanana.com/maps/183857
Map #2: GG_DF_LEGO_ZIGZAG | Link: http://css.gamebanana.com/maps/182856
Map #3: GG_DF_LEGO_KLEINEVILLA | Link: http://css.gamebanana.com/maps/182569


this one I would say NO
Map #4: GG_CORNER_EX | Link: http://css.gamebanana.com/maps/176869

[$Money$]

gg_scoutzknivez2_css is made to have lower gravity. Question is can Zero set this map up with lower gravity like the Star Wars map or is that something the mapper has to do?
I think maybe 400 or 500 is good enough to get to those upper levels.
This is all based on this map being the same as gg_scoutzknivez, idk haven't played it in long time

[MadGamer101]

This one looks like fun.

Map #1: gg_105th - http://css.gamebanana.com/maps/183857

[Kasp3r]

I'm ok with taking out 1-4 as much as 1 will sadden me. 5 lol no. Map is to good to get rid of. As for your replacements yes on maps 1 and 5. 2 and 3 look like they have potential to be fun to play on. 4 no, too many people will camp the back of their spawn and delay game. Happens all the time with that map. It's a great map I love that map it's fun and can be quick, but with no block on you can't get to the higher ledges or jump across.

[Wallet]

we play all of those maps all the time

My point exactly we just simply play them all the time. Some new maps that no one has ever played before would make the server have good population. Either way this server has a good amount of players cause we are all friends. I think what would be REAL cool if we did a rotation of maps. liiiike
We have 20-30 maps TOTAL, and every 1st of the month we can remove those 20-30 maps and switch them out with new 20-30 maps. Giving us new maps every damn month.

[Wallet]

Yea they will try to camp, That was just a throw in XD.

[rawrr]

I say keep dust city and texture city advanced. Texture city advanced is a popular map, people like it, it populates the server.

If we get rid of the popular maps that get played all the time, the server will surely die. People like to play the maps they like, they will come back for those maps. We get rid of them, and they will stop coming back.

[Wallet]

oh no, trust me there are better maps than texture advanced. They just choose it cause all the other good maps have been played already.

[rawrr]

We're not going to get rid of one of our most popular maps, that's just not going to happen. Sorry