Agreed, since a psychological screening seems excessive and are not that reliable (cue the link to the NASA Diaper-wearing, stalking Astronaut). Democratic voting doesn't seem to work picking admins either by my experience (cliques vote in their friends and take over the server).
I think an easier way would be to require several months of payment in advance. Let's say three months. If you break the admin rules at any point and your admin powers are removed, you do not get your money back.
At least with this system, we can get one to two months of good behavior out of some of the admins since they fear losing $20 plus. Zero also takes less risk losing revenue to support the server.
As Hobo points out, money can be used to keep people honest.
And I thought you and Holy were making all those obsessive threads because you didn't know better. Serves me right for giving you the benefit of the doubt. Nice try with the guilt-stricken attempt to not seem like a hypocrite.
Anyway, I agree with you. This kind of stuff doesn't belong on the forums. While I'm tired of seeing so much drama revolving around Chelsea, it's not surprising to see a bunch of young guys fawning and headbutting for the attention of an attractive young woman. Her reaction to it is anything BUT ladylike though, which causes most of the drama.
Walter, as I've told you in the past, you have to rise above it. Part of being an adult is learning the wisdom of what battles to choose. This battle is not worthwhile. Ignore it and move on to something more important.
Take a lesson from the Marines.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leapfrogging_(military)
People should also take note that things said in private should stay in private. This ancient adage rings true even online.
Originally Posted by TheLittlestHobo
Register To Reply
