Once again, if they want to have rules enforced then write out a set of rules so that new members know the proper etiquette. Considering 1 of the 3 moderators is missing and the other two have never been seen to enforce the rule doesn't help either.
Actually I am 3 for 3 in your original rule, and 1 for 1 in your exceptions. And once again you are making a second list of exceptions to justify breaking your own rules.
No, I'm just showing you that you aren't perfect and should not play "how dare you" when you are guilty of the same. My sex life is also irrelevant, because I will tell it like it is to everyone here regardless of how many times I get laid.
I am not a hypocrite because I have not once here claimed I am better than you. I am only stating you have no reason to be upset at people for breaking "rules" that you have broken. And rules should be clear cut and laid out so they can be properly enforced. Especially on an internet forum where there isn't that much to moderate.
"Use to be a rule for the Admin Abuse and Unban sections that only IBIS, the admin that banned and the person banned were allowed to respond" is a statement that should require very little to understand. The rule is that you shouldn't respond to an admin abuse thread. Then it was changed to you shouldn't respond to an admin abuse thread BEFORE the clan members or parties involved respond. Then finally you changed it to you shouldn't respond to an admin abuse thread before the clan members or parties involved respond UNLESS it is a significant period of time that neither have responded to the situation.
Once again, you are creating exceptions. I don't say it as an insult. I don't say it to feel superior. I say it because that is the case, clear as crystal.