Quote Originally Posted by Christmas View Post
Maynard: Steel can be WEAKENED due to fire damage, and the steel was already WEAKENED due to structural damage. And it was. That is a FACT. Also the south tower did slightly tip before falling back into itself (check the stills) considering the majority of the damage was on one corner. The north tower went straight down because the plane hit it almost directly at center.

Also what basis do you have to imply that the tower should have just tipped over like a tree?

The footage I gave you WAS live. The firefighters testimony mainly discusses the collapse (one group talks about the towers going BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM down the building) and during a fire explosions do happen. Despite all these "explosions" there doesn't seem to be enough to show that a sufficient amount (such as what was seen in the building you showed that was less than half the size of the twin towers ) was used to destroy the building.


Also why were plane parts found by firefighters and rescue staff at the scene of the pentagon, why was a light pole shown wedged inside a taxi cab (one of five that were knocked off due to the plane hitting it), and why was there so much witness testimony discussing a large aircraft (with windows on the side)?



Perhaps a plant? By the infamous NWO?

Also a 757 COULD make that size of a hole in the pentagon. Look at the size between the damage to the pentagon and the fire truck in that frame.
I don't care about your pole, or scrap metal. if you've ever seen a plane crash before you know what it looks like, and that's NOT like what they show you at the pentagon Lol.

steel beaing weakend at the top, would have no made the building come down.... and it can only be slightly weakened, and we're talking a SMALL weakness lol, nothing even remotly hot enough 2 do what they claim