Reality...

[StarsMine]

Bull fucking shit, Maynard. Not once had a hijacked commercial airliner been used as a missile, so you mean to tell me that an average joe who is affected by the shock and awe of a hijacking is going to go gung-ho and try to take back the plane when they could easily sit back and wait for the plane to land and let the professionals deal with it (without suffering a scratch)? Also while there is the threat of a bomb being on board? Get real.

Also there was the plane that landed in Pennsylvania, They fought and therefor it did not hit the target.

[XxMastagunzxX]

like I said prior, I'm not interested in your biased views, I want actual facts or I'm not interested. and the first crews at pentagon and WTC gave me more proof then anything... even more so when the governemnt then had them stop showing those news segments.

if the government didn't do it. they knew it was happening and coming.

You haven't posted any facts yourself. And your view is obviously the one that is biased.

[StarsMine]

like I said prior, I'm not interested in your biased views, I want actual facts or I'm not interested. and the first crews at pentagon and WTC gave me more proof then anything... even more so when the governemnt then had them stop showing those news segments.

if the government didn't do it. they knew it was happening and coming.

Who said they didn't know it was coming? of course they knew something was coming, there is always a terror threat, what they don't know is where and when every attack will come from.

And what Mastagun said about your facts is true

[Christmas]

Lol the question is where's yours

Pretty sure the burden has been proven in spades on our part. None to come from yours, though. Still waiting on that figure you have regarding how weak steel can get from burning jet fuel.

how many times do I have 2 state for you ppl that un-like most of you, I wasn't 8 years old when this happened, I was actually watching the news the moment this took place, I saw the first news crews say theres no plain debree, just lotts of scrap metal, then an hour later all those tapes were pulled from LIVE TV, just like the security tapes.

Strange because there is a lot of news footage out there, both with testimony of explosions, small jet planes, large jet planes, north of Citgo station, south of Citgo station, no plane parts, lots of plane parts, etc etc etc. I don't see any coverup attempt.

if the government wasn't in control of 9/11 then they sure as hell knew it was going 2 happen.. and I would say thats' equally as bad.

I'm sure they did.

they were doing drills based on planes hitting into the pentagon years before 9/11 took place.

The Empire State Building was hit by a plane in the past, so what makes you so paranoid that drills are doing such in the event that a plane accidentally crashes into a very important government building? With an airport nearby?

Heaven forbid the government runs a plausible mass casualty exercise.

[Christmas]

like I said prior, I'm not interested in your biased views, I want actual facts or I'm not interested. and the first crews at pentagon and WTC gave me more proof then anything... even more so when the governemnt then had them stop showing those news segments.

if the government didn't do it. they knew it was happening and coming.

Plane parts are not biased. The structural damage and accredited engineers research is not biased. Your interpretation of them is biased.

Are you saying the FDNY, the pentagon, and the civilians who were there were in on it? Did they just magically get rid of flight 77 since it couldn't have been that plane? What about the witnesses? Co-conspirators.

Your paranoia is telling.

[maynard]

You haven't posted any facts yourself. And your view is obviously the one that is biased.

sorry that I can't post video photage the government has restricted.. ill try and figure out a way. also I spoke what I believe, and said why... you ppl are the ones trying 2 either just argue with me or convince me of differnt. I personally don't care what the majority of you think on this cause you're all 2 damn young 2 have a real opinion on a 10 year old matter.

[loka]

http://wtc.nist.gov/NCSTAR1/PDF/NCSTAR%201A.pdf
Friend who is a civil engineer gave me this link for a paper I was doing on 9/11 for terrorism class.

http://www.asce.org/pdf/5-1-02wtc_testimony.pdf
This one is just testimony of engineers who tested out how the building collapsed.

[XxMastagunzxX]

Maynard I was 11 years old and I have seen all of the footage as it happened live.

[Christmas]

http://wtc.nist.gov/NCSTAR1/PDF/NCSTAR%201A.pdf
Friend who is a civil engineer gave me this link for a paper I was doing on 9/11 for terrorism class.

http://www.asce.org/pdf/5-1-02wtc_testimony.pdf
This one is just testimony of engineers who tested out how the building collapsed.

I haven't read the asce's research on the collapses but I can guarantee that NIST's is amazing work.

[maynard]

Plane parts are not biased. The structural damage and accredited engineers research is not biased. Your interpretation of them is biased.

Are you saying the FDNY, the pentagon, and the civilians who were there were in on it? Did they just magically get rid of flight 77 since it couldn't have been that plane? What about the witnesses? Co-conspirators.

Your paranoia is telling.

nahh I'm saying they were doing drills at the pentagon years prior 2 this happening that included a plane hitting into the pentagon, and by some kid of luck the majority of the staff was on the opisite side of the building when it happened just out of luck right?