Maynard admin abuse

[maynard]

Hmm seems like your makeing up your own rules. No were in the rules is there an ex-admin to be ban for stuff he did. It seem like you ban him because you don't like him. HMMM. Seems this isn't the first time either.

making up my own rules? it's a direct quote from the rules section in the forum Lmfao way 2 fail. maybe you should actually try reading the rules, cause clearly you have not. no shit I don't like him. grats, sherlock holmes... you cracked the obvious case! I'm pretty sure when I said I'm "disgusted" with him, that was a rather clear indication.

Good god it's spelled "to," "too," or "two."

But anyways -- IMO Perma ban was out of the question. You forgot to take into account the second line of the rule:



Stay away from perma bans unless 1) they are obviously using hacks and you record a demo of them doing it, or 2) they are causing the server to crash or are seriously compromising the server in some way (with a demo). The fact that he was being a general douche does not allow you to ban him permanently. Leave it to Zero to ban people retroactively and don't take it into your own hands; it's not your place to do such things.

based on the rules that zero wrote and are currently being used, I have rights 2 my claim. but as I said, I'm not interested in the opinion of ppl who don't know anything about this issue.

and yes, it is in an admins place 2 ban ppl who deserve it or are hacking or whatever... hence the entire point of being admin. zero comes on damn near never, if we waited for zero 2 remove every hacker, and or spammer, or server crasher then nothing would ever happen. as I said 2 christmas... if you need an issue 2 tackle, go look into the 2 ppl that chibby perma bannd. 1 for mic spamming once and the other guy did nothing wrong what so ever. chibby just doesn't like him, hence the 15 second long demo of him shooting someone through a wall cause the guy had been going 2 the exact same spot every round the entire game.