30qs (fake?) and Superty007

[DrTran]

And its just as easy to deny something just as well. Its easy to record an aimbotter, its not the same recording a cade breaker as you're less likely to see the act.
As I said multiple times, you were caught doing this shit under multiple names in the past; it was just bad timing on my part that I didn't notice earlier to match your id to previous tools I've dealt with. I don't see the need to record people I kick or temporarily ban so you just got lucky with that. But you're right, its just my word against yours since I didn't take that step.
You're right Acolyte, we'll just wait for Zero to deal with this.

When (if) you check the logs can see what's up with Superty007? 30qs doesn't seem to know him apparently, so I'm curious why banning him by steam id also banned Superty.

[acolyte_to_jippity]

no no, serious;y. i want him to answer my 2 quuestions. why are you "admin" and what was that attatchment supposed to show me?

i hope he didn't expect when i said "there. problem solved" that he meant he was unbanned. that zero had looked through sourceTV, made a decision, and unbanned him in the 8 min between my post and that one.

[gokkunfan]

Its easy to record an aimbotter, its not the same recording a cade breaker as you're less likely to see the act. I don't see the need to record people I kick or temporarily ban so you just got lucky with that. But you're right, its just my word against yours since I didn't take that step.

So you admit you actually have no evidence or proof that I did anything wrong. Well, we're making some progress at least. As far as stories go, I would say that yours has been inconsistent, full of holes, and with unnecessary derogatory remarks.

no no, serious;y. i want him to answer my 2 quuestions. why are you "admin" and what was that attatchment supposed to show me?

The screenshot was to show that the original problem wasn't actually solved. Actually, no problem was solved at all. It was like a band-aid thrown onto a gunshot wound, then "Problem solved" gleefully announced afterward.

As for my perception of an admin, it's typically not someone who tries to curse at people, spread rumors and hearsay, and attempt to defile someone's name with false claims that lack proof or evidence. That was the meaning behind the quotation marks.

[acolyte_to_jippity]

The screenshot was to show that the original problem wasn't actually solved. Actually, no problem was solved at all. It was like a band-aid thrown onto a gunshot wound, then "Problem solved" gleefully announced afterward.

As for my perception of an admin, it's typically not someone who tries to curse at people, spread rumors and hearsay, and attempt to defile someone's name with false claims that lack proof or evidence. That was the meaning behind the quotation marks.

1. i never said it was. if you had read my entire post, you would have seen i talked about zero having quite a bit to do, that your problem would go on the list, and to be prepared to wait

2. fair enough

edit: goodnight. i'll be back during chem

[ZERO]

Unfortunately this ban occurred longer than the sourcetv demos record over. They auto delete after so long to save space... however I can check the hard copy txt logs from the console and confirm what name he was using and if we was coping that other guys name or what. Also when you ban a steam id it will only ban the person with that exact string. It is possible to spoof steamids and that is why I ask people to use sb_status because it can not be spoofed. Because other admins have linked this id to problems on other servers this id will remain banned unless I find something that conflicts with what the admins have said.

[DrTran]

Also when you ban a steam id it will only ban the person with that exact string.

So Superty007 was banned along with the other guy for having the same id; am I correct?