Clusterfuck in the making

[StarsMine]

The fact that it is 2560x1600 tells me it is dual dvi according to the dvi spec. Also all 30" monitors are basically those dimensions. Bolth issues can be confirmed by the 3007WFP-HC which is the other screen I am considering b/c while a few hundred it has 50% less input lag.

Well I dont see how you will plug in two DVIs into a moniter with one DVI port, You just need to use a dual link, thats still just one DVI though.

[OnEyEdMaN]

Actually if it ever happens you may be able to get me a 22" widescreen that has a swivel base for portrait mode. I will need this as a secondary monitor so I just need what ever I can find the cheapest. I will half to remember to pm you if my shit ever breaks lol

i got mine for 65 bucks it may not have the same resolution but 1680 x 1050 is just right for me woot.

[ZERO]

Oh it is impossible to buy a 22" with the same resolution as the 30" they do not exist. But I can force a higher one and have it scaled down so it looks the same size. It is not as if I care about great quality on the secondary monitor. I just need it b/c it makes it easier to work on things.

[Rage]

Just buy a Insignia 32" flat screen tv. It has everything so it doubles as a PC monitor. With the LCD/HD it makes a wicked sick monitor.

[StarsMine]

Just buy a Insignia 32" flat screen tv. It has everything so it doubles as a PC monitor. With the LCD/HD it makes a wicked sick monitor.

1920 x 1080 or 2560 x 1600, unless you are going to be 20 feet away from your monitor, you buy a monitor, not a TV

The whole HD thing is sortof bullshit when computer monitors have been "HD" or greater since the mid 90s.

[acolyte_to_jippity]

1920 x 1080 or 2560 x 1600, unless you are going to be 20 feet away from your monitor, you buy a monitor, not a TV

The whole HD thing is sortof bullshit when computer monitors have been "HD" or greater since the mid 90s.

with the tv, i'm sure you could scale it in such a way that you don't use the full screen when it's acting as the comp. monitor, but do use it when you wish to watch tv.

[StarsMine]

with the tv, i'm sure you could scale it in such a way that you don't use the full screen when it's acting as the comp. monitor, but do use it when you wish to watch tv.

And make the resolution smaller?
A tv only has so many pixles

[acolyte_to_jippity]

And make the resolution smaller?
A tv only has so many pixles

your previous ppost made it sem the problem w/ the tv was the size of the screen, while i said you could possibly make the comp. display on only a section of the screen (so as to not make it over-huge). and anyway, a 32' tv's maximum resolution would probably be too big anyway, so reduceing the resolution for when it's in comp mode should be fine. essentially, running at 1280x800 would be reduceing the resolution, yet that's still a perfectly acceptable resolution

[ZERO]

I actually do not care that much about the res, it is the speed and color that are important. On that note every TV is ruled out except for plasma. The tech used in lcd tv is a joke compared to real monitors. The screens I am looking at are using ips panels and require virtually no input lag. Most LCD screens have terrible input lag over 30+ms and use crappy TN panels.

[StarsMine]

anything less then 5ms is gravy