Fluffy Frufflebottoms 8/18/2010 11:05 PM

[SCRIBBLE]

Bad ban, no hacks in the demo and I didn't see any in game.

[Darkphoenix]

I was in that game as well.. good game fluffy it was awesome.

I find every game that someone does exceptionally good they MUST be hacking. There maybe some who do but some just have a horse shoe up their ass

[Wolfenstinger]

Honestly, if there's evidence not being shown that proves he's an actual hacker, he might as well be unbanned until more valid evidence is shown. Hell, if hes going 26 - 1 in GG, i might as well start trying more on WCS beta and go 50+ kills - 5 or less deaths.... But then ppl rage and leave and then i gain no more xp therefore slowing up lvling...

Summing it up, he should be unbanned unless somebody provides better evidence than what was shown at kavinsky's thread.

[Spasm]

Honestly, if there's evidence not being shown that proves he's an actual hacker, he might as well be unbanned until more valid evidence is shown. Hell, if hes going 26 - 1 in GG, i might as well start trying more on WCS beta and go 50+ kills - 5 or less deaths.... But then ppl rage and leave and then i gain no more xp therefore slowing up lvling...

Summing it up, he should be unbanned unless somebody provides better evidence than what was shown at kavinsky's thread.

Should have never been banned in the first place. Admins aren't supposed to do what hobo did. He banned someone on someones word. He didn't even take the time to watch the demo.

[hmdbrian]

yea, i was in server when all this happened. I was actually senior admin and imho was he fishy, of course the guy went 26-1 and 26-4 back to back....but i didnt do the ban myself for the reason there really was not any hard evidence. I too say unban him until we get more hard evidence, until than just assume the guys a beast...and fluffy when your that good you have to expect people harrassing you about being a hacker, you just gotta ignore them.