I have to agree Mag said it the best. The rules say gay pics or body parts. The body parts I can think of close ups and the gay part is two or more men. Just one guy doing a nonsexual pose hard to find as gay.
I have to agree Mag said it the best. The rules say gay pics or body parts. The body parts I can think of close ups and the gay part is two or more men. Just one guy doing a nonsexual pose hard to find as gay.
I said it was artsy, to me that means something different then art. But thats just something I differentiate in my head and i know full well everyone has a different definition of art.
I must agree with Pink above me.
You have to be crazy insecure about your sexuallity to be phased by such a picture as this. Its not like its a close up of a penis like some people spray and get away with it.
and what's the body part of a gay man? his dick obviously. do you really think when zero made the rules and said there can't be gay images, no shocking or gross content, no fat chicks, and no body parts (which was in the same sentence as the gay men rule) but posting naked dudes is ok? it's kinda obvious ppl, think lol.
A) Gay men or body parts<--- dick
Maynard - The WCS Guy
That's my point!!!
A) Gay men or body parts
the first half of this rule clearly states no gay content. the second half clearly states no body parts of the male sex, due 2 it being in the same sentence as gay men.
it's not like oh hey! this guy is strait, so he can pose naked, but that gay guy cant! lol... come on ppl think for christ sakes. it's no dick images.
Maynard - The WCS Guy
Here is my spray intended specifically for this thread:
Discuss:
If you were a beautiful sound in the echos all around, I'd be your harmony.
u know starsmine, you certainly are defending the right to have gay sprays on the server pretty intensely. maybe you should take your gayness elsewhere. lol jk