YOUmadBRAH? ibis.a

[maynard]

you are all arguing over stupid pointless shit, none of this has shit to do with why he was muted nor banned...no one should use others names or impersonate in my opinion, just for the fact is a douche thing to do...but ddrop this shit, has nothing to do with his ban.

I went into this issue cause carina threatened craig that he should not do it again, when she really has no place 2 be doing that.

I don't even really know craig, I'm not like buddy buddy with him or something. just pointing out the obvious flaws with what some people have been saying in this thread.

[XX0wnsXY]

Technically when you post your picture on the internet, you are giving unspoken consent for that picture to be used by other people, within reason. I'm sure that there can be a case brought up if there is impersonation, but that is not the case. Wagner, don't give people your pic or even post it if you have a problem with others using it.

Like the others said, if you want to dispute that, make a new thread wagner and let zero review it..otherwise, it isn't really relevant to this thread.

[Nemesis]

just a note, paparazzi is able to do it because they are considered a "public figure" and therefore have different laws about showing their face.

an average person cannot be shown in and media without their permission as it becomes "intrusion upon seclusion". also if you're providing that image to the pulbic outside of the person's knowledge, that is also illegal.

there's a whole bunch more but the short verson is that it's all agianst the law.

[Perry]

illegal use of another person picture (of there self)
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Is_it_ille...re_to_a_person

illegal use of putting other people pictures up.
http://au.answers.yahoo.com/question...9151331AAvAIFg

hall took the pic of himself, its HIS PICTURE BY LAW. you use it. Its against the law. unless with express written permission.

l2r

/thread

[hallwagner]

Technically when you post your picture on the internet, you are giving unspoken consent for that picture to be used by other people, within reason. I'm sure that there can be a case brought up if there is impersonation, but that is not the case. Wagner, don't give people your pic or even post it if you have a problem with others using it.

Like the others said, if you want to dispute that, make a new thread wagner and let zero review it..otherwise, it isn't really relevant to this thread.

never gave him picture. he went and found it....cuz hes a homo

[Mrs. Xen_Warrior]

I don't even really know craig, I'm not like buddy buddy with him or something. just pointing out the obvious flaws with what some people have been saying in this thread.

Speaking from one of Ragone's good friends though it's fucked up that he has it as his spray and multiple people have asked him to change it, he only has it on there to be malicious and makes a mean joke about Hall whenever he sprays it.

[nightstrife]

illegal use of another person picture (of there self)
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Is_it_ille...re_to_a_person

illegal use of putting other people pictures up.
http://au.answers.yahoo.com/question...9151331AAvAIFg

hall took the pic of himself, its HIS PICTURE BY LAW. you use it. Its against the law. unless with express written permission.

l2r

/thread

ok these two just suck as answers since wiki and yahoo answers are answers for people just like you and me. Even Colleges tell you dont use those sites so not good proof.


A Stand for Photographer’s Rights

The right to take photographs in the United States is being challenged more than ever. People are being stopped, harassed, and even intimidated into handing over their personal property simply because they were taking photographs of subjects that made other people uncomfortable. Recent examples have included photographing industrial plants, bridges, buildings, trains, and bus stations. For the most part, attempts to restrict photography are based on misguided fears about the supposed dangers that unrestricted photography presents to society.

Ironically, unrestricted photography by private citizens has played an integral role in protecting the freedom, security, and well-being of all Americans. Photography in the United States has an established history of contributing to improvements in civil rights, curbing abusive child labor practices, and providing important information to crime investigators. Photography has not contributed to a decline in public safety or economic vitality in the United States. When people think back on the acts of domestic terrorism that have occurred over the last twenty years, none have depended on or even involved photography. Restrictions on photography would not have prevented any of these acts. Furthermore, the increase in people carrying small digital and cell phone cameras has resulted in the prevention of crimes and the apprehension of criminals.

As the flyer states, there are not very many legal restrictions on what can be photographed when in public view. Most attempts at restricting photography are done by lower-level security and law enforcement officials acting way beyond their authority. Note that neither the Patriot Act nor the Homeland Security Act have any provisions that restrict photography. Similarly, some businesses have a history of abusing the rights of photographers under the guise of protecting their trade secrets. These claims are almost always meritless because entities are required to keep trade secrets from public view if they want to protect them.
onhttp://www.krages.com/phoright.htm


so is it wrong yes but It was placed on the internet in publics eyes and was placed out for all to edit and do as pleased.

I hope i was still on topic lol the mute was a good choice but may be the button for perma should be changed to a different number because i press one to shut them up fast just a suggestion

[Craig Boner]

never have i seen so many people up in arms over a spray that isn't gay porn

its a picture of hall, its funny. stop taking it so personal carina because it's been my spray for several months and you're the first one to piss and moan about it. close the thread i got the response I was looking for thanks.
also thanks for the multiple (terrible) interpretations regarding copyright law. it's not illegal its funny grow a pair and get over it.

[Craig Boner]

How abot you just come out of the fucking closet faggot and admit you want hall balls deep in your shithole?

honestly what kind of faggot uses another guys pic as a spray? Where and how is this funny?

Faggot i hope get aids from sharing needles with your pre-op lover.

i enjoy horse cock stuffed deep up my ass and down my throat.

[Rapedollar$]

i do what i can.