Zm Rules v3.1

[ZERO]

Yea it looks like you can get on top of that object thus allowing you to throw it so it should be fine.

[mcilwain]

another idea..

-Players can not leave the game then rejoin to become a zombie with out being tagged.

we have some people that do this for escape maps.

also jsut to clear it up, ness im tellnig you im right, right now.

Is this crouch spot illegal..with the vending machine where it is.
He asked me to ask here so i am (;



p.s. Barricading - Regarding illegal barricading / God items

* Barricading a Illegal barricade (as deemed in the illegal barricade sub section)
* Barricading all entrances to a crouched spot.
* Illegal props and/or items

LAWL an admin is cading a crouch spot and yelling to another its not?

[acolyte_to_jippity]

LAWL an admin is cading a crouch spot and yelling to another its not?

it's iliegal only if the machine is farther back. as it is, it is possible to get on top and flip it out.

it's much MUCH harder once it gets pushed back against the wall

[KɅΞW]

So I came across a good question today. Under the rule Barricade Breaking – Whoever gets into the the room first is the sole proprietor of that room, and has the freedom to do whatever he deems necessary to survive. Should the person lose his right after he left or still retain the right under some circumstances like grabbing another vending machine or trying to fix the cade from outside?

[Rezel]

That is definitely a good question, I would probably guess that if he leaves it for a certain amount of time (Dis including trying to get other items from other rooms) that yes it could change to whoever went in next. Though the problem with this rule would be that it could get harry trying to figure out who got it next. Your question needs to be debated for sure, I think we need some more input from everyone before we set it in stone though.

[anex]

Good find Kaew. We should have it so that if first person officially leaves to go to another cade then its free game. If he leaves to go get a vending machine but is coming back then it should still be his cade.

[KɅΞW]

Yea, it hit me when certain players were having argument after the owner of the room decided to break the cade from outside, I don't want to name names but I don't want to take all the credit either.

In my opinion, there is no need for 2nd owner since it will be a hassle to figure out and it'd save us from the "I was the 2nd one in here" argument. It will just be a cade without ownership, with all the standard rules applied of course.

[Rezel]

I am liking that idea quite a bit kaew, the simpler the rule is the less people have to argue over the issue. I think having the barricade as free game for all who is in it is definitely a good idea. I also think that we need to probably define a minimal time that you need to be in a barricade to have ownership over it, It gets rather annoying when people walk into a room, leave, and then come back randomly and claim ownership.

[acolyte_to_jippity]

I am liking that idea quite a bit kaew, the simpler the rule is the less people have to argue over the issue. I think having the barricade as free game for all who is in it is definitely a good idea. I also think that we need to probably define a minimal time that you need to be in a barricade to have ownership over it, It gets rather annoying when people walk into a room, leave, and then come back randomly and claim ownership.

another problem is people who enter a cade and do nothing but block people out of it. best example is dessert_fortress, the room w/ the door and teleporter. sinister sith especially likes to wait for someone to open the door, then stop in the entrance and not move. sometimes he'll let one or two others in. but the clusterfuck of people trying to get in prevents the door from closing, and him blocking everyone gets the entire group tagged. could we add a clause to the end of the rules that goes something like "thou shalt not use these rules to act like a douchebag"?

[taz1stP]

we should add this to the rules section of the forums so that people can find this easier and we need to add a rule that you cant kill people of your own team with canon or put something of the kind in here so that people quit yelling at me when i do. b/c i don't see it here.