I'll watch the vids soon. however, Acolyte and Toasties are pretty good observers since they mainly play GG. You claim they have no proof when there are witnesses and two admins on oh and don't forget the 3 demos.
what is more fishy is that you try to defend yourself when you have nothing to back it up.
actually lemme rephrase that:
whats even more fishy is that you try to defend's Nolies's case that he wasn't hacking while watching his demo:
http://www.ibisgaming.com/forums/sho...103#post103103
you said:
"The demo looks inconclusive. He doesn't watch people through walls, as you can see with sv_cheats 1 and mat_wireframe 3 on.There is a point though when he looks at someone through the floor for a brief instant, and that is 1+ evidence for wallhacks, but also looks like it was just chance. There's also one point where he predicts a player coming down a pathway, but anyone could have predicted that, especially with good headphones. What else have you people found for evidence? So far I wouldn't call it enough evidence to ban, and as an admin, I would have spectated for more time."
seems like you want us to think you are an expert in hackers when clearly you fail at defending one and failed at trying to be one or maybe you are Nolie.