Quote Originally Posted by Naka View Post
Good god, I had a long-winded post written in the case that I was banned without proof or notice.

Name in Game: Counter Strike Source 208.43.70.233:27015
Steam-ID:
Who banned you: Autumn | ibis.a
When: 12:54am
Where: 208.43.70.233:27015
Why banned:
From my sources, Autumn believes I was wallhacking.
Other/Reason to unban:

I honestly don't care if I'm unbanned or not, this has been my first few games in a long while and I have shit to do these days.
I can say with 100% certainty that I was not wallhacking, and I STRONGLY urge any experienced player to take a look at the demos, especially Autumn. Hopefully Autumn and you other hack-accusers can learn from demos of better players (not necessarily me) and realize the difference between hackers and those who don't hack. I hope this serves as an example to decrease bias and unfair bans.

If you two are both admins, maybe your abilities should be called into question, depending on the outcome.

Edit: watched my demo as posted by acolyte, I can see the part where you must have thought I was hacking. As I came up the ladder, you should be able to see that I saw the enemy player amongst the boxes, and that's when I also jumped and attempt to shoot him over the box. After that, there was only one or two places he could have appeared from, and that's where I moved my mouse towards.
I guess I shouldn't have expected many of you to realize that. If anyone has more scenes in which you think I hack, let me know, I'll explain them when I have time.
I'll watch the vids soon. however, Acolyte and Toasties are pretty good observers since they mainly play GG. You claim they have no proof when there are witnesses and two admins on oh and don't forget the 3 demos.
what is more fishy is that you try to defend yourself when you have nothing to back it up.
actually lemme rephrase that:
whats even more fishy is that you try to defend's Nolies's case that he wasn't hacking while watching his demo: http://www.ibisgaming.com/forums/sho...103#post103103

you said:
"The demo looks inconclusive. He doesn't watch people through walls, as you can see with sv_cheats 1 and mat_wireframe 3 on.There is a point though when he looks at someone through the floor for a brief instant, and that is 1+ evidence for wallhacks, but also looks like it was just chance. There's also one point where he predicts a player coming down a pathway, but anyone could have predicted that, especially with good headphones. What else have you people found for evidence? So far I wouldn't call it enough evidence to ban, and as an admin, I would have spectated for more time."

seems like you want us to think you are an expert in hackers when clearly you fail at defending one and failed at trying to be one or maybe you are Nolie.