Personal opinions aside, it went as expected based on actual evidence submitted. The evidence is not there. There is no hard link.
Do I personally believe she did it? Of coarse.
Personal opinions aside, it went as expected based on actual evidence submitted. The evidence is not there. There is no hard link.
Do I personally believe she did it? Of coarse.
Make all your last demands for I will forsake you and I'll meet your eyes for the very first time, for the very last.
maynard <ibis>: they are awkward and last 2 damn long. I prefer thinner smaller ones
Lets look at this hypothetically. If I left my 2 1/2 years old son alone in the bathroom and he drowned. What would/should happen to me. 1.) Spend time in jail for child neglect.(5-10 years) 2.) Be charged with negligent manslaughter. (10-20 years on top of the neglect) 3.) Stay in jail until court, then be set free. Keep in mind this is me coming clean and admitting that I left my toddler alone.
I would say atleast 5-10 years because I was responsible for the childs life and now it is gone. She serverd 2 waiting until court. The found her innocent of child neglect....... WTF
I too am glad this is over, but now the bigger problem is shutting this bitch up.
Can't stand her, I swear she wants every crime committed to end with the death penalty.
I especially don't like how often she is staring into the camera.
Nancy Grace knows nothing about what the Death Penalty does to the system. It overcrowds the prisons, but this bitch doesn't care. Most DA offices don't care about the effects of overcrowded prisons in general. They just want numbers adding to their growth of conviction rates (fact).
I can't stand her face. I feel like she rapes my soul with her stare. lmao.
Oh and hypothetically speaking, we wouldn't know if she neglected her child in the first place if there was no sufficient evidence. So let's take some law 101. The DA's office did a poor job of trying to prove that the use of chloroform into child abuse. How is it that you can prove chloroform use if swamp water tends to acidify chemical readings? If evidence is not supporting murder or manslaughter, how can personal opinion then say "well she neglected the child based on presumptuous evidence?" That's what gets me about everyone upset about this case. You go strictly on the evidence. The DA's office are morons. My girlfriend tells me things about the case since she watches Nancy Grace so much, and the first thing I said was "how the fuck are they gonna prove anything when the body was basically destroyed by the acidity of swamp water?" Trust me when I say this jury had more time with evidence then the public will ever have. Your comparison of your child drowning in bath tub water is lackluster without a total scenario.
Personally, I think she did it. Evidence... was laughable. She got lucked out with tools as prosecutors.
มวยไทย
Got a blister? Ibuprofen. Can't feel from your waist down? Ibuprofen. Got a spider bite? Ibuprofen. - SPC S-Rod & Me
The point of a hypothetical is to give something that is similar, but not an exact match. The only evidence I need is that her fucking defense was, I lost track of her and she drowned in the family pool. That was her defense case, child drowns: family freaks: hide body in swamp. Her defense screams neglect or atleast she should have been made to serve something for her child dieing on her watch. As far as the verdict I totally agree that the jury couldn't convict of murder. The physical evidence wasn't there.
Last edited by Spasm; 07-07-2011 at 06:43 PM.