New way of dealing with bans

[ZERO]

If the initial ban is unanimous it can not be appealed. Also I am trying to leave the framework in for when we start to get upper level admins.

Then it will look more like this

admin issues ban (police)

upper level admins review and vote (court)

clan level reviews and votes if it was appealed (federal court)

zero reviews (supreme court)

The clan has the ability to decide on a case even if it not being appealed in that a case can be reviewed by them if that it wanted. In any case the clan decision always overrides the upper level. This is not how it works right now but how it will work in the future. It will not be for another month or so before we start to bring upper level admins in. This setup is to carry us over until then.

The application system for upper level admin will start in August.

[maynard]

Ohhh ok. that makes sense.

[THE HOLY SH**T!]

[ZERO]

Oh I forgot to note that logically if the first 2 votes are for the same option than action can be taken. Also this does not count as unanimous unless there was a 3rd vote that was for the same as the first 2. The point is that after 2 votes for the same decision than a 2/3 majority has occurred.

[Steamer]

Logically I reserve the right to step in at any time and make a final judgement. Any judgement made by me can only be reversed by me.

Winning?

zero reviews (supreme court)

Won.

Overall great system. After the last explanation on appeals process it looks like a good deal. While it may be a bit more thorough and time consuming, it will most likely make sure the "baddies" are kept out and and skilled players are actually left to play...

TY for info / STEAM ID req in title. This will make it much easier to find certain individuals.

[SCRIBBLE]

OK I see how it works. It's only going to take a slight adjustment to everyone's process but it will make a huge difference in the long run. Sounds good.