Yes.. And ISP's are against that. Mostly the ones with television services also (which is most, more so with Comcast and AT&T). I remember when they where QQ'ing about broadband costs associated with these "bandwidth hogs"...
This one pretty much explains what I'm trying to sum up. http://articles.philly.com/2010-12-0...us-genachowski
Man they are fucking stupid in their PR statements / repercussion document's. Such blatant lies.
Make all your last demands for I will forsake you and I'll meet your eyes for the very first time, for the very last.
maynard <ibis>: they are awkward and last 2 damn long. I prefer thinner smaller ones
I was reading up on this. So technically there's no fine or jail time. It's basically just getting the ISP's to annoy the fuck out of you with alerts/popups/redirects warning you.
Technically it isn't THAT bad, but I just see this as a stepping stone. You get the framework built to monitor everything, talk the ISP's into it easily because they won't be "penalizing" their customers, just warning them. The ISP's say "ok it's not that bad" and agree.
THEN the RIAA gets congress to allow them to use the already built framework to financially penalize people.
Step 1.. collect underpants
Step 2...
Step 3.. MAKE MONEY!