Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 17 of 17

Thread: ISPs make agrement with RIAA/MPAA

  1. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StarsMine View Post
    Their claim from the first link in the artical (the sixstrikes PDF)
    19. Isn’t this just about ISPs trying to reduce online traffic?
    • No. The fastest-growing segment of web traffic is legal online content that
    subscribers will be encouraged to use. Access to lawful content services is
    expanding rapidly, and ISPs are seeing more households add broadband service
    and TV service at the same time. According to Nielsen, the number of
    households with both a broadband connection and a home television subscription
    increased in the last year from 61% to 66% of households.
    Yea.. Ok... Netflix? Lies.
    Make all your last demands for I will forsake you and I'll meet your eyes for the very first time, for the very last.

    maynard <ibis>: they are awkward and last 2 damn long. I prefer thinner smaller ones

  2. Default

    Netflix is taking massive ammounts of bandwidth. ONlive to for those who use it (massive, really massive)


    Quote Originally Posted by Zero
    So... what your trying to tell me is that you saw a spherical square?

  3. Default

    Yes.. And ISP's are against that. Mostly the ones with television services also (which is most, more so with Comcast and AT&T). I remember when they where QQ'ing about broadband costs associated with these "bandwidth hogs"...

    This one pretty much explains what I'm trying to sum up. http://articles.philly.com/2010-12-0...us-genachowski

    Man they are fucking stupid in their PR statements / repercussion document's. Such blatant lies.
    Make all your last demands for I will forsake you and I'll meet your eyes for the very first time, for the very last.

    maynard <ibis>: they are awkward and last 2 damn long. I prefer thinner smaller ones

  4. Default

    Typical American service provider attitudes. This should surprise no one.

    Quote Originally Posted by Steamer View Post
    Most smaller ISP's route their traffic through a larger ISP's "pipes". Trust me, you will be affected one way or another.

    I read about this a month ago. Expected them to go through with it. No surprise to me. As Zero pretty much summed up, it's more of a bandwidth / money issue for the ISP than copyright infringement "education".
    That kind of transit traffic isn't pushed through a BRAS, though. If your ISP doesn't participate, then you won't be affected.
    Quote Originally Posted by &&toasties
    I'd do Fluffy any day.

  5. Default

    Yeah, my ISP does not even honor cease and desists. Its a owned by Lafayette Consolidated Government and all they care about is making money.




    End Of Line

  6. Default

    I was reading up on this. So technically there's no fine or jail time. It's basically just getting the ISP's to annoy the fuck out of you with alerts/popups/redirects warning you.

    Technically it isn't THAT bad, but I just see this as a stepping stone. You get the framework built to monitor everything, talk the ISP's into it easily because they won't be "penalizing" their customers, just warning them. The ISP's say "ok it's not that bad" and agree.

    THEN the RIAA gets congress to allow them to use the already built framework to financially penalize people.

    Step 1.. collect underpants

    Step 2...

    Step 3.. MAKE MONEY!

  7. Default

    You can still encrypt you data. Its not like the isps are giving the mpaa our info. Mpaa will just be doing wht the normally do and collect the isps who download a spicific file and sena letter down the line. Just now the isps will keep track of the letters


    Quote Originally Posted by Zero
    So... what your trying to tell me is that you saw a spherical square?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •