panda abuse :( again

[Bane of Soldiers]

Why is this under admin abuse... panda did what he should've as an admin... sounds cut and dry to me. Warnings were issued. Original ban time doesn't seem excessive. Perma ban is justified under the "no bypasssing bans" rule

[Penis シ]

That is an understanding, not a rule. We have acted in a "once a hacker, always a hacker" manner.

However, we don't, at the moment, have a specific rule for alt accounts.

I don't disagree though, if he was found hacking, he should either appeal or take his ban and leave. I do say to permaban until he does one of those on that stance alone.

[maynard]

However, we don't, at the moment, have a specific rule for alt accounts.

sure we do, it's called instant ban... leaving a server 2 avoid mute (back in the day) or jumping on a diff account 2 undermine a admins decision = instant ban (not perma). given he's been found for hacking, and perma'd for it.. this account will now be perma banned also.

he can make an unban request, but there is no admin abuse here...


closed