Dejobro | 5-23-12 | 7:15 EST | STEAM_0:1:18853194

[brett friggin favre]

If you didn't think he hacks, as you said yourself, then you should vote no, not that your "unsure" or couldn't make a decision. Your vote makes no sense to what the words you typed state.

You say strongly no, yet you vote not decisive, undetermined, no definite decision or result, ect, ect, ect... It just baffles me.

sorry if i'm being unclear. i'm providing the ticks i see closest to hacking, and saying that they don't look normal. but at the same time, i don't see them as being artifically aided. the fact that he does have those fishy ticks and the more than fishy background is enough to pique my interest, but the lack of concrete evidence means i have to vote no. i'm staying away from the inconclusive option because inconclusive = no. the reason my vote is "strongly" no is because it is not decisively yes, and i don't like leaving myself on the fence. if i'm gonna say no, i'll do it with conviction, if i'm gonna say yes, i'll do it with conviction.

fishy as fuck? yes.
would i vote to perma ban? not based on what i can see.

EDIT: i feel like this wasn't directed at me. i'm tired and slow. anyways i'll leave it up there as insight into my process. lolz