Dejobro | 5-23-12 | 7:15 EST | STEAM_0:1:18853194

[brett friggin favre]

If you didn't think he hacks, as you said yourself, then you should vote no, not that your "unsure" or couldn't make a decision. Your vote makes no sense to what the words you typed state.

You say strongly no, yet you vote not decisive, undetermined, no definite decision or result, ect, ect, ect... It just baffles me.

sorry if i'm being unclear. i'm providing the ticks i see closest to hacking, and saying that they don't look normal. but at the same time, i don't see them as being artifically aided. the fact that he does have those fishy ticks and the more than fishy background is enough to pique my interest, but the lack of concrete evidence means i have to vote no. i'm staying away from the inconclusive option because inconclusive = no. the reason my vote is "strongly" no is because it is not decisively yes, and i don't like leaving myself on the fence. if i'm gonna say no, i'll do it with conviction, if i'm gonna say yes, i'll do it with conviction.

fishy as fuck? yes.
would i vote to perma ban? not based on what i can see.

EDIT: i feel like this wasn't directed at me. i'm tired and slow. anyways i'll leave it up there as insight into my process. lolz

[Steamer]

Not you, Owns.

Either my brain is fucking with me and I see shit others don't, as I have been pretty stressed lately, or the dude is/isn't cheating. Just trying to clean up shit that looks very sketchy to me and what I saw as assisted aiming. Not saying I'm not wrong, as I have been in the past. Rather try and keep cheats out then just let them run rampant in server, sometimes there are mistakes, just try to steer clear of such, but it happens. To me this isn't one, but that's left up to the others to decide.

The former is also why I have been taking long rounds with the bans, specifically the harder ones, as obvious is, well, obvious.

[XX0wnsXY]

Not you, Owns.

Either my brain is fucking with me and I see shit others don't, as I have been pretty stressed lately, or the dude is/isn't cheating. Just trying to clean up shit that looks very sketchy to me and what I saw as assisted aiming. Not saying I'm not wrong, as I have been in the past. Rather try and keep cheats out then just let them run rampant in server, sometimes there are mistakes, just try to steer clear of such, but it happens. To me this isn't one, but that's left up to the others to decide.

The former is also why I have been taking long rounds with the bans, specifically the harder ones, as obvious is, well, obvious.

It shouldnt baffle you. Its not going to matter. He is banned for a month..thats plenty of time to sort it out.

[SCRIBBLE]

I see evidence of reactionary tracing and team confusion typical of players using material hacks.

[brett friggin favre]

I see evidence of reactionary tracing and team confusion typical of players using material hacks.

Any specific ticks? Id love to take another look at this guy, he doesn't add up

[maynard]

why the hell is this still open?

someone buck up and take care of this.

[Steamer]

Any specific ticks? Id love to take another look at this guy, he doesn't add up

Look around the tubes in center when the group gunfights of multiple teams happen. Just one example, on the first demo.

[brett friggin favre]

Look around the tubes in center when the group gunfights of multiple teams happen. Just one example, on the first demo.

yeah looking at that again, i'd have to say yes on walls. after a good night's sleep i'm seeing it better. and thanks to cyber for pointing out tick 11k in the 2nd demo, i'd say walls for sure. not meaning to be a flip-flopper, just getting a better look at it.