Was going to post in vid thread but it's too cool for school. I appear in the AK-74/.40cal portion, the rest is random shots of my lil bro/nephew using my guns so i could take the high speed shots. It's hd if anyone cares.
Was going to post in vid thread but it's too cool for school. I appear in the AK-74/.40cal portion, the rest is random shots of my lil bro/nephew using my guns so i could take the high speed shots. It's hd if anyone cares.
meh...
Maynard - The WCS Guy
Okay lets see you've got a photo of a maybe 16 year old asian girl with a latter model smith and wesson with her finger on the trigger pointed straight up in the air, great...
http://www.nrahq.org/education/guide.asp
you called a rifle an assault rifle when really all it is, is a magazine fed rifle not an ""ASSAULT RIFLE" nor battle those are evil buzzwords given to it by the media, just like "high capacity" which is bullshit its normal for a gun to have 15 rounds in the magazine it was designed with
you're wasting good ammo on the ground at 4 feet WITH RIFLES, ever heard of a ricochet? you could get just that by shooting at the ground like that and have the bullet come back at you or at someone else, theres a reason why you shoot at a hill like berm like this at a shooting range at a minimal distance of 25 yards
and your not improving your accuracy by shooting at targets like that, it should be at 25 yards like with clay pigeons or paper targets and your pistol hold needs work, your putting pressure on your hold from the right side.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...2856867071363#
Last edited by Kavinsky; 06-03-2010 at 03:36 PM.
Hook your thumb through a belt loop if you're bump firing.
Overall safety is extremely lacking. I'm sure there is a local range where they will teach you the basics of gun safety.
lock your arm on your non-dominant eye eide. let the recoil run through it into your shoulder when fireing the pistol. you don't want your elbows hinging and your forearms hinging "up" so much as you want your shoulders to rotate slightly. this way it's a much more cyclical motion .
why don't you both study proper handgun shooting stances. in the position he is in, albeit sloppy, his dominant arm should be slightly bent and 'pushing' while the non-dominant arm, slightly bent as well, should be 'pulling'. weaver stance uses muscles to control recoil rather than skeletal.
acolyte you are talking about the modified weaver (chapman) and still the dominant arm is locked and straight out under the line of sight 'pushing' and the non-dominant arm is slightly bent still 'pulling' to add tension. this is combo muscular/skeletal in the control of it's recoil.
i don't recommend the isosceles unless it's the modern isosceles but i only recommend that for people who are very experienced and still only in rare situations. learn this one just for education purposes, it's tricky for self-defense and IMO useless except for eye dominance issues.
I get the feeling that if I was feeling mean I could probably get this posted here
http://idiotswithguns.blogspot.com/
just fyi but weaver stance is no longer the predominant stance while firing sidearms. when using weaver, it almost negates any protection given by body armor. isosceles is the predominant firing stance for all military and law enforcement. but i do have to agree that for casual/sport shooters weaver and mod weaver are meh, i still pref iso, mainly because it allows the most mobility when strafing or moving to your next target.
edit: but i digress, gun that was a pittiful display of marksmanship all around. shooting high caliber rifles at bottles (i think) from like 5 yards? please, do what aco said and go plink some 300-500 meter targets with that ak. learn how to shoot properly before you try (and fail) at showing off your "arsenal" (lol) of guns.
edit #2: im not trying to be mean it just pisses me off when people who dont know how to properly use something as dangerous as a firearm, go and fuck off with one.