Supernatural Mafia

[DJ_MikeyRevile]

i agree but damn. i kinda like sin, unlike the other 7.2 billion people on this rock

Its getting all emotional in here. Such bromance, so wow.

[Old Bastard]

I believe Sin's claim so far, Rufus wasn't a power role in supernatural and he damn sure wasn't a bad guy, so either fake claim and someone else has him or it's actually him. I'm leaning toward it actually being him so far. Phil drives a point about Stan though, O' where art thou, Stan?

[Sin]

It was definitely a good idea, it stirred the pot a little. It gives us townies a better choice. Sure claiming is a last resort kind of thing, but so is no lynching on day one. I'd rather take one for the team (even though it'd be a waste of a day1 lynch since I'm obviously telling the truth), than have these idiots vote no-lynch on day1 and give you scumbags an easy kill, forcing more "guessing games" on day 2.

That being said, I did get votelynched day1 the first game I played, the second game I played I was the Mafia Cleaner and Blade ruined that shitty game by giving out too much information as a Mod (with Nem).

Here's a proposition though. For the townies that don't want to FULL Claim, how about we just start getting NAMES of characters out there? What's the harm in that? If a Mafia member lies, we'll at least know that much when they get counter-claimed.

Why lean towards a lynch on me anyway, Nemesis? Lynching me will only hurt town.

[Nemesis]

Because lynching you would be 100% safe. You don't have a power role that would hurt the town to lose, and the very slight chance you're scum or third party (because we should assume there's a third party).

[brett friggin favre]

There is something to be said about Stan though, he's not been around the forums at all, then pops up out of nowhere to sign up for this. I'm not surprised he hasn't been active, and wouldn't be surprised if it continues.

[SCRIBBLE]

We also lose an intelligent vote against mafia if we lynch Sin which is not 100% safe. If Sin is not lying then we have a safe voter, mafia would not make a VT a priority target.

[Sin]

Calling for lynch on a claimed VT is scummy, any which way you try to twist it. And by pushing it, you're doing the SAME thing as no-lynching basically. It will give town no more info than a no-lynch would. But go for it Nem, put the townies down one potential member that can last the whole game because of a lack of an ability/skill.

Role Madness games are more fun.

[Nemesis]

There is something to be said about Stan though, he's not been around the forums at all, then pops up out of nowhere to sign up for this. I'm not surprised he hasn't been active, and wouldn't be surprised if it continues.

I have no idea what a Stan is, but it sounds like a faggot.

[SCRIBBLE]

Every game I am all for policy lynch against people who do not contribute, stan would be the one that falls in that category as of now.

[Sin]

mafia would not make a VT a priority target.

That.