Mafia Game: The Donner Party

[Sin]

Mikey, I'm going to ISO a few of your posts here for further review. See below:

Can we get a vote count plea. Kthx
Also, people.... Note reactions to votes. How people react to being voted.
Look at those who appear to be trying hard when tryhards are not necessary.

- - - Updated - - -

My current read? We have a bunch of tasty townies playing patty cake on a forum thread.

Great pro-tip above, althought the WAY that you chose to go about it is indicative of lazy reaction testing. This isn't EpicMafia, where you can track votes in the chat and respond IMMEDIATELY to them. In a forum setup you need more, a town play would ALWAYS include backing/reasoning for a vote, Mikey. What I did was a great reaction test, by the way you reacted.

The second part of this quote is filler and possible projection of your cannibalistic ways.

Why are you getting defensive over my post?

Yeah Mikey, why are you getting defensive over my post?

as i always like to never say...
I fos everyone so therefore i am at least 100% correct that at least one of them is maf.

Why say it then? Lazy at best, anti-town at worst.

You dont tell me what to do serial killer. Im sexy and I know it.

Filler and projection?

Sigh.

This game is going to be tough.
If killer and maf can joint win, we absoutly have to kill one by end of day tmrw. Otherwise pray one dies at night.

Im not personally getting a scum read off phil but I will have to go over all the posts when I get home from work.

This game IS tough. Why would you even think that they could joint-win? Trying to lead people into meaningless banter like you did with the NK/NK debacle last night?

You didn't even go over all of the posts when you got home, and if you didn't you didn't update us with your thoughts. Scum trying to look town? Possibly.

Unless they thought both quick lynching phil would hammer... lawl but it didnt phil atill needs one vote. Look at the last sentence in there vote posts, is as if they anticipated the day to end.

Good work here. Would read again.

I am still suspicous of blade. Will be back after I get home from work in about 2 hours.

I dont think we should stall this anymore, we have a ml and we should stick with who we plan to lynch. Further pushing will result in more role claims and the more vts the enemy knows the larger percentage the enemy will hit a valuable asset too town.

At first you cast your suspicion. You then go on to state you will be gone for 2 hours, but you want to get to a mislynch before you even disappear? All of this knowing full well town would possibly be out (4) votes going into Day 2. To quote you "are you mad?" - Mikey 2014

Keep in mine the night phase. There is a possibility 4 townies die tonight, best case scenario only 2. We wont know if they were townies either.

See ^ for my response.

Sorry bad guys, I lied. I will not be hammering zambi.

Filler. Also, you all of a sudden no longer want to rush a mislynch on a "claimed" townie? What's with the switcheroo?

vote zambi

Now blade. Dont be a debby and ruin thia for everyone. The balls in your court now.

- - - Updated - - -

I.e. my last fos now has no votes and has to choose between being hammer or waiting for town to post there fos reports.

Additionally, im 90% certain no one will sneak hammer. Even though I think we should commit to lynching zambi.

This logic is weird. Blade had already unvoted, Zambi. Why does it matter to TOWN, if YOU put Zambi back to L-1? Anyone could have done it. Blade is smart enough not to hammer anyway, and smart enough to jump off of a wagon on a potential townie. You putting Zambie back to L-1 means shit.

That being said, kids. THAT is how you reaction test in a forum game format.

- - - Updated - - -

I'm more worried about all the power roles using their abilities on one person.

Don't worry about what the PR's choose to do, and stop trying to impact their decisions you cretin fuck.