Reality...

[maynard]

Plane parts are not biased. The structural damage and accredited engineers research is not biased. Your interpretation of them is biased.

Are you saying the FDNY, the pentagon, and the civilians who were there were in on it? Did they just magically get rid of flight 77 since it couldn't have been that plane? What about the witnesses? Co-conspirators.

Your paranoia is telling.

nahh I'm saying they were doing drills at the pentagon years prior 2 this happening that included a plane hitting into the pentagon, and by some kid of luck the majority of the staff was on the opisite side of the building when it happened just out of luck right?

[XxMastagunzxX]

Maynard most of your argument comes from assuming things...

[Christmas]

nahh I'm saying they were doing drills at the pentagon years prior 2 this happening that included a plane hitting into the pentagon, and by some kid of luck the majority of the staff was on the opisite side of the building when it happened just out of luck right?

I'm sorry that a single plane can't hit 90% of the pentagon.

[maynard]

I'm sorry that a single plane can't hit 90% of the pentagon.

yeah.. we will just call it luck that no 1 was near where it hit.... and that they were doing drills and preparing for this 2 happen years prior 2 it happening...

[Christmas]

yeah.. we will just call it luck that no 1 was near where it hit.... and that they were doing drills and preparing for this 2 happen years prior 2 it happening...

What are you talking about? There were workers in the pentagon who were killed in the attack.

Also:

http://www.informationclearinghouse....rticle3533.htm

An Army medic found the practice realistic.

"You get to see the people that we'll be dealing with and to think about the scenarios and what you would do," Sgt. Kelly Brown said. "It's a real good scenario and one that could happen easily."

This is the only drill that was done regarding a plane crash in the pentagon, and it was one of many drills done during those few days.

[Curdy]

i must admit the pentagon was a tad suspicious i must admit, considering the lack of any decent video of it.

[XxMastagunzxX]

Curdy go back and see the video I posted. The camera is like 4 fps...definitely enough time for a plane to hit between frames

[Christmas]

Curdy go back and see the video I posted. The camera is like 4 fps...definitely enough time for a plane to hit between frames

An object is visible in the video, and using that with the damage to the poles, damage to the pentagon, plane debris, identification of the bodies, and witness testimony, the evidence of flight 77 being involved is easily corroborated.

[maynard]

Curdy go back and see the video I posted. The camera is like 4 fps...definitely enough time for a plane to hit between frames

lmfao you can't see a plane in that vid, give me a break. and what you mean your vid? that's like the main video that was released by the government for them 2 have claim that a plane hit, regardless of the fact there's no plane... as I said, there's cameras on every angle of that building and across the way, all were restricted.... why? if they're not up 2 bull shit, why not just release some good footage, or 1 of the far off cameras that would actually show it.

posting the same vids thats been around for 10 years isn't any form of proof...