PDA

View Full Version : SIG 04/10/2013 10:00 PM STEAM_0:1:1295932 -Sig



Trigger Unhappy
04-10-2013, 10:26 PM
Name in Game:Sig
Steam-ID: STEAM_0:1:1295932
Where:GG Server gg_training_yard
Link to any previous bans :http://bans.hootsclan.com/index.php?p=banlist&hideinactive=true&searchText=STEAM_0:1:1295932 ; http://dhgsourcebans.site.nfoservers.com/sourcebans/index.php?p=banlist&hideinactive=false&searchText=STEAM_0:1:1295932
Reason to ban: excessive tking in spawn and being a douche canoe.

This guy seems to like Tking. did a google search of his steam ID and came across the above links. He comes in during nade round and at tick 2100 starts Tking teammates. He continues this for a few rounds and leaves just before we voteban him. He then comes in again at around tick 28000 and starts Tking again.

Patmonster
04-10-2013, 10:33 PM
Watched demo, above ticks are correct, guy is being an all around asshole griefer.
Added 2 day ban. Couldn't find how long it should be, if this isn't correct then feel free to change it.
Link to ban: http://www.ibisgaming.com/sourcebans/index.php?p=banlist&searchText=STEAM_0%3A1%3A1295932&Submit=

(Edit: I'm pretty sure you're suppose to have 2 votes before banning but the guy is just being a prick and doesn't need to be playing here for a couple days.)

Trigger Unhappy
04-10-2013, 10:37 PM
Appreciate the quick response Pat. Also for some reason the voteban (after he left) didn't work. wasnt sure if this was a bug or if it resets once they leave.

Locust
04-10-2013, 10:58 PM
Watched demo, above ticks are correct, guy is being an all around asshole griefer.
Added 2 day ban. Couldn't find how long it should be, if this isn't correct then feel free to change it.
Link to ban: http://www.ibisgaming.com/sourcebans/index.php?p=banlist&searchText=STEAM_0%3A1%3A1295932&Submit=

(Edit: I'm pretty sure you're suppose to have 2 votes before banning but the guy is just being a prick and doesn't need to be playing here for a couple days.)
You do need the two admin votes for the action to be taken. Also, take the philosophy of warn/kick/ban. Unless you can prove he's been warned about the rule by an admin you should be issuing a warning rather than a ban.

Patmonster
04-10-2013, 11:06 PM
Ya I thought it was two. But before u throw me under the bus, watch the demo and see he was warned over and over.

Locust
04-11-2013, 12:39 AM
Ya I thought it was two. But before u throw me under the bus, watch the demo and see he was warned over and over.
I was just stating what the process is as i did not watch the demo.

SCRIBBLE
04-11-2013, 11:01 AM
grief confirmed, no chance of rehabilitation expected, ban suggested.

brett friggin favre
04-11-2013, 11:13 AM
yeah, a 2 day ban should serve well enough in this case. closed.